Katy Kirby stopped by the NPR office to play a ‘Tiny Desk Concert’ with her band – Austin Arnold on drums, Margaux Bouchegnies on bass, Logan Chung on guitar and keys, and Lane Rodges on piano. They performed three tracks from Kirby’s latest album Blue Raspberry – ‘Fences’, ‘Cubic Zirconia’, and ‘Table’ – as well as ‘Juniper’ and ‘Portals’ from her 2021 debut Cool Dry Place. Watch it below.
Wendy Eisenberg has unveiled a new song, ‘HM’, which will appear on their forthcoming LP Viewfinder. Listen to it below.
“‘HM’ is a resurrected tune for small ensemble I wrote in 2016,” Eisenberg explained in a statement. “I wrote it about the feeling of paralysis that occurs when everything you see feels invented or arbitrary. The written material is a line of unbroken and breathless melody, but the rest of the piece is a game—how do you improvise around the fixity of a phenomenon when that phenomenon is the totality of your project?”
Viewfinder is slated for release on September 13 through American Dreams. ‘HM’ follows lead single ‘Lasik’.
St. Louis hardcore outfit Squint have announced a new album called Big Hand, which is out October 25 via Sunday Drive. Along with the news, they’ve shared two new songs: ‘Pack Rat’, which comes with a music video, and ‘Sunshine’. Check them out and find the album cover and tracklist below.
Produced by Jon Markson, Big Hand references “the constant moving of time on a clock,” according to a press release. “In a more literal sense, a big hand can pack a punch, swell, break and recover.”
Big Hand Cover Artwork:
Big Hand Tracklist:
1. Lesson Learned
2. Sunshine
3. Magic
4. Half Asleep
5. Well Wisher
6. Pack Rat
7. Crawl Back
8. Grace
9. Golden State
10. Big Hand
Trace Mountains have put out a new song, ‘Friend’, from their upcoming record Into the Burning Blue. Featuring Craig Hendrix of Japanese Breakfast, the track arrives on the heels of the 7-minute lead single ‘In a Dream’. Check out its accompanying video, directed by sisters Alyx and Sam Soard, below.
“I like to joke that I’m a ‘loner in recovery,’” Dave Benton shared in a press release. “When I wrote “Friend,” I was facing a pretty big transition in my life. I needed to address my own loneliness, and writing the song was like my first step on that path. It was my way of saying, “Yep, I feel lonely sometimes,” and dealing with that good old millennial malaise. I’m just really grateful for the people in my life and trying to tackle the meaning of a word like “Friend” feels impossible, but it’s fun to try.”
About the video, Sam Soard said: “When Dave and I were brainstorming ideas for “Friend,” we found ourselves reflecting on the bizarre nature of the loneliness epidemic. During one of our phone calls, I suggested portraying him as a werewolf. We both laughed at the idea initially but soon realized it was a playful way to capture the surreal social experience we’re all enduring. Dave and his reputation as a well-known cat mom brought a unique perspective to this concept. Exaggerating his personality in this creature-feature felt like a fun way to explore the song’s themes. Our goal was to use humor to emphasize the importance of genuine companionship in a world that often feels chaotic and disconnected.”
Into the Burning Blue comes out September 27 via Lame-O Records.
Closebye have unveiled a new song, ‘Lucky Number’, from their forthcoming album Hammer of My Own, which is out this Friday (August 23). It follows the recently released ‘Two Knocks’. Check out a music video for it below.
Opening up about ‘Lucky Number’, singer-songwriter Jonah Paul Smith said:
The first inspiration for “Lucky Number” came from some article I read about lottery winners who had destroyed their own lives after winning the prize. The idea of a lucky number ultimately leading to someone’s downfall was sad and funny to me. I was thinking about luck and destruction, and at the time, I was mourning the loss of a friendship. The song became about all of those things. One day you feel resentful and betrayed, and another day you feel ashamed of your own stake in the mess. The song follows that shift of blame, as the chorus lyric turns from “take a look at what you destroyed” to “take a look at what I destroyed” later in the song.
A lot of this album is about rebuilding, and this song, the opener of the album, places me sort of looking around at the wreckage and trying to figure out what happened.
Joanna Sternberg has released a new song called ‘A Country Dance’. It’s featured prominently in Between the Temples, an upcoming film directed by Nathan Silver and starring Jason Schwartzman and Carol Kane. Listen to it below.
Recorded in upstate New York by Alex Wenquest, ‘A Country Dance’ was inspired by Sternberg’s close friend Sami Bronowski, who was the first person to encourage them to sing in public. “The joke of the song is: I don’t dance, I don’t drink wine, I don’t go outside and I DEFINITELY do not go out in nature (allergies and insect phobias), but I wanted a playful nonsensical song to sing and to capture the fun I have with my dear pal,” Sternberg explained in a statement.
“I think the reason the song can fit in this beautiful film, is that it captures a freewheeling imaginative feeling,” they added. “The lyrics are vague enough to be applied to anything, and it just creates a ‘fun and fancy-free’ mood!”
Desire have released a new single, ‘I Know’, taken from their upcoming album Games People Play, which is due October 2. It follows the previously unveiled singles ‘Vampire’, ‘Human Nature’, ‘Darkside’, and ‘Dangerous Drug’. The song’s accompanying video was directed by Desire and filmed and edited by Johnny Jewel. Check it out below.
“Lost in a hazy daydream on the islands of Malta & Gozo,” Megan Louise shared in a statement. “We can pretend sometimes…I know.”
Throughout the week, we update our Best New Songs playlist with the new releases that caught our attention the most, be it a single leading up to the release of an album or a newly unveiled deep cut. And each Monday, we round up the best new songs released over the past week (the eligibility period begins on Monday and ends Sunday night) in this best new music segment.
On this week’s list, we have Christopher Owens’ ‘No Good’, the defeated yet dynamic new single from his first album in nine years; Fashion Club’s revelatory duet with Perfume Genius, ‘Forget’; Charly Bliss’ ‘Back There Now’, a vibrant, catchy highlight off their new album Forever; Fievel Is Glaque’s ‘As Above So Below’, the fluttering, delightfully intricate lead single from the jazz pop duo’s third album; Frost Children and Danny Brown’s bombastic collab ‘Shake It Like A’; ‘Vanessa’, the haunting yet tender new single from Midwife’s upcoming album; ‘Mutations’, another captivating preview of Nilüfer Yanya’s new album; Merce Lemon’s stirring, subtly frantic ‘Watch Me Drive Them Dogs Wild’; and Wild Pink’s latest single, the bright, expansive ‘Sprinter Brain’.
Blockchain has thrown the world for a loop by stepping outside of crypto gambling and online gambling and into polling booths. The need for a transparent electoral processes has never been more important. With so many important issues on the line, it is time to say goodbye to traditional voting systems. Old voting systems face challenges such as fraud, manipulation, and inefficiency. All that is about to change with the introduction of blockchain technology and smart contracts. Reshaping the electoral landscape has nothing except benefits for people across the globe.
What are Smart Contracts?
Smart contracts are advanced self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement directly written into code. Smart contracts are part of blockchain’s impressive technology, and smart contracts can transform the way elections are conducted. Smart contracts can guarantee transparency and security in the electoral process, regardless of what type of election.
Why Use Smart Contracts in Elections?
Using smart contracts in elections gives a new sense of transparency. Smart contracts operate on a decentralized network, meaning every transaction is recorded on a tamper-proof ledger that all participants may access. Anyone with access to the blockchain can verify the entire electoral process, from voter registration to ballot counting.
Smart contracts can enhance the security of elections by preventing fraud and manipulation. The blockchain technology ensures that once a vote is recorded, it cannot be altered or tampered with. Thus, eliminating the risk of vote tampering, ballot stuffing, or other forms of electoral fraud. There are so many problems that plague traditional voting systems. Cryptographic techniques can encrypt voter identities and ensure the confidentiality of individual votes. Smart contracts are upping security in ways never thought possible.
The Unbeatable Efficiency of Smart Contracts in Voting Systems
One significant advantage of smart contracts in elections is the unbeatable efficiency. Traditional voting systems involve manual processes such as paper ballots and manual counting. Elections also require verification by electoral officials. All these tasks take up important time. Smart contracts automate many aspects of the election process. Previously slow tasks like voter registration, identity verification, and ballot counting would speed up drastically. Plus, smart contracts would reduce the need for human intervention effectively streamlining the process from start to finish.
Other ways smart contracts can help elections is by increasing voter participation and accessibility. In many countries, voter turnout is decreased by long queues, limited polling stations, and difficulty accessing voting locations. Online or remote voting through blockchain-based platforms would make the electoral process more convenient and accessible for voters. Smart contracts could change the ability for people to access voting, especially those unable to physically attend polling stations due to mobility issues or work commitments.
Building Trust in the Electoral Process
Smart contracts can build a greater trust and confidence in the electoral process. Blockchain technology can help address concerns about electoral integrity and legitimacy. Increased trust can encourage greater participation in the electoral process.
Smart contracts offer several perks but implementing smart contracts for elections is not without challenges. There are multiple technical considerations to tackle. The need for robust cybersecurity measures must be carefully addressed to ensure the integrity of the electoral system. Legal frameworks would require updates to accommodate the use of blockchain technology in elections to address privacy, data protection, and voter rights concerns.
Smart contracts offer solutions to many challenges facing traditional voting systems. Smart contracts can provide transparency, security, efficiency, and accessibility in elections. Blockchain technology is enhancing trust and confidence in the electoral process. As countries worldwide prepare for the 2024 elections,, adopting smart contracts could be just the thing needed to empower voters.
Author’s note: An earlier version of this essay appeared in Issue #6 of John LeMay’s The Lost Films Fanzine. It has been republished with his permission.
“When I see horses running as fast as they can, tears well up in my eyes.” poet Kenji Miyazawa
In February 1966, Japanese film director Akira Kurosawa’s exclusive contract with Toho—the studio that nurtured his early career and produced eighteen of his previous twenty-three movies1—came to an end, and he started considering the option of working overseas. Ever since Rashomon (1950) took home the Golden Lion award at the Venice Film Festival in 1951, Kurosawa had steadily developed status as an international film icon; his period masterpieces Seven Samurai (1954) and Yojimbo (1961) were successfully remade as westerns, The Magnificent Seven (1960) and A Fistful of Dollars (1964); and more than sixty offers had poured in from Hollywood admirers salivating at the opportunity to work with him. (One proposed collaboration would’ve starred Peter O’Toole as William Adams, a sixteenth-century navigator who became the first Englishman to reach Japan and be appointed a samurai by the shogun.)2
That June, Kurosawa appeared at the New York Four Seasons alongside Embassy Pictures’s Joseph E. Levine (one of the key personnel behind importing Ishiro Honda’s 1954 Godzilla to the United States) and announced plans for an action picture called Runaway Train.3 It was to be Kurosawa’s first color production, though he intended to shoot it with a black-and-white sensibility: a dark locomotive racing through snowy landscapes. The following spring, word came out that he would also direct sequences of 20th Century Fox’s Tora! Tora! Tora!, a U.S.-Japan co-production about the bombing of Pearl Harbor.4
Alas, both projects ended up being realized without the famous director. Runaway Train experienced numerous delays and was eventually shot by Andrei Konchalovsky in 1985. And Tora! Tora! Tora! was a catastrophe on all fronts. The script Kurosawa and co-screenwriters Hideo Oguni and Ryuzo Kikushima spent months putting together was ordered trimmed by the American financiers, and Kurosawa found himself at odds with Toei, the studio in charge of the movie’s Japanese sequences. (Toei’s modus operandi was to crank out films in an assembly line-esque fashion, and the crew clashed with Kurosawa’s unflagging perfectionism.) Other complications arose: at one point, Kurosawa suffered a nervous collapse, and 20th Century Fox launched a campaign portraying him as mentally ill. Finally, on Christmas Eve 1968—after a mere twenty-three days of shooting—he was let go from the project.5
Fallout from the Tora! Tora! Tora! debacle left Kurosawa with a tarnished reputation in the Japanese film community. What’s more, he was now stranded in an industry no longer willing to support the kind of movies he liked to make. Television had arrived in Japan in 1953 and became a household commodity within just a few years.6 Proliferation of at-home entertainment contributed to a massive decline in ticket sales: by 1970, attendance had fallen from an all-time high of 1.13 billion in 1958 to roughly 255 million.7 Consequently, the studios downsized, and budgets became smaller than what’d been afforded in the ‘50s and ‘60s, when Kurosawa and others turned out classic after classic.
Some responded to this sea change by switching to TV. Kurosawa’s friend and contemporary, Keisuke Kinoshita, told historian Audie Bock in May 1977: “[I]f I had to work in theatrical films I’d only be able to make one a year at the most under today’s bad financial conditions. To make features now requires too much compromise with the financiers who demand a sure thing—and of course I’m no good at compromise. […] Of course I would rather make features, but in television I can do whatever I want and a lot of it.”8 Kinoshita’s protégé, Masaki Kobayashi, despite loathing television, agreed to make a drama called The Fossil—simply so he could edit footage from the show into a 200-minute movie.9 As for Kurosawa, when one of his producers suggested he try his hand at a TV show, he allegedly replied: “I just can’t direct a stupid television drama.”10
In July 1969—together with Kinoshita, Kobayashi, and Kon Ichikawa—Kurosawa established a new production company, Club of the Four Knights. “We borrowed from a bank and this is the first time they have helped [a] film production. If [our first] film is a success, they will give us more, so it must be a success.”11 Alas, the only movie to come out of this partnership was Kurosawa’s Dodesukaden (1970), made for ¥100 million (triple the cost of the average Japanese feature at the time).12 In addition to lackluster box office, the picture accrued less-than-ecstatic reviews both domestically and abroad. New York Magazine’s Judith Crist dismissed Dodesukaden as “disappointing […] pedestrian and trite, its effects garish rather than surreal. It is [Kurosawa’s] first film in five years; we look forward to his next.”13
As it happens, that ‘next film’ was one Crist and other international admirers did not see—for it wasn’t and to this day hasn’t been given an official release outside Japan. Not considered part of Kurosawa’s official filmography, the movie in question only occasionally appears in studies on his work—and even then usually in the form of a fleeting mention. What’s more, it was the sort of project unexpected of the great director: made for the small-screen medium he despised.
Co-produced14 and broadcast (on August 31, 1971) by Nippon Television, Song of the Horse is a 73-minute color documentary about equines in contemporary Japan, narrated by Noboru Mitani and child actor Hiroyuki Kawase. The duo had recently played a beggar and his son in Dodesukaden, and Kawase was fresh off a role in Yoshimitsu Banno’s Godzilla vs. Hedorah (1971); he would later appear in Jun Fukuda’s Godzilla vs. Megalon (1973). As the narrators, Mitani and Kawase behave like audience members: while Mitani occasionally lectures Kawase about horses, their commentary largely consists of colloquial remarks on the images. (“Like a brush!” Kawase exclaims at a close-up of a foal swishing its tail.)
The film itself is virtually plotless. Following an opening pair of slow-motion close-ups of galloping thoroughbreds, Kurosawa presents a montage on the depiction of equines in Japanese art (paintings, sculptures, children’s illustrations, etc.). From here, he takes us to rural Japan, where horses, despite not being as plentiful as they once were, are revered. Mitani describes how the people of Nanbu (now part of Iwate Prefecture) “used to live, eat, and sleep” with the animals. We see Chagu Chagu Umako, an Iwate summer festival in which horses adorned with colorful fittings parade from Onikoshi Souzen Shrine to Morioka Hachiman Shrine. We see another festival in Soma District, Fukushima Prefecture, an area known for horse breeding. Mitani explains that while Japan breeds three thousand horses each year, their numbers are decreasing—as agrarians have less use for them thanks to advancing technology. Nevertheless, he assures Kawase (and the audience) that Japanese horses shall not vanish, for they’re still viable for entertainment.
At this point, Song of the Horse changes emphasis, focusing less on the role the animals play in 20th century Japan in favor of depicting their daily lives in captivity. A colt is born in a stable; he learns to stand—a clattering of bells on the soundtrack accentuating his triumph—and later trots outside with the adults. Various groups of full-grown horses gallop at breakneck speed (as Kawase cheers “Run faster!”). The animals graze and spar: a clash between two stallions is filmed in slow-motion, underscored by drums and intercut with shots of cloud formations. As the picture enters its final thirty minutes, thoroughbreds are sold at auction and prepared for racing. If the picture has anything resembling a climax, it would be the 38th Japan Derby—June 13, 1971—wherein the horse Hikaru Imai emerged victorious.
Song of the Horse is a curious and lackluster entry in Kurosawa’s filmography. While some of the early sequences depicting equine reverence are lively and interesting, the majority of the film consists of grueling footage of the animals simply grazing or galloping through fields for interminable periods of time. The repetition becomes tiring, and the film seldom knows when to cut from a shot long after it’s ceased being interesting. In one punishing moment, the audience endures two long-lasting shots (more than three minutes combined) of a group of horses running. During which the camera occasionally zooms in or out on the animals but shows little else; the background, the scenery, the way everything’s shot—it all remains the same.
Part of the problem might be that Kurosawa apparently didn’t enact his usual practice of cutting the film himself. Song of the Horse’s editing is credited to Reiko Kaneko, an assistant to Kurosawa who previously cut Dodesukaden—in addition to three Ishiro Honda sci-fi movies: King Kong vs. Godzilla (1962), Gorath (1962), and Matango (1963)—and it is the cumbersome image assembly that hurts Song of the Horse more than anything. (My recurring impression was that the picture had been intentionally padded out to meet a mandatory runtime, which in fairness to the editor may have been the case.) Despite some impressive visual tricks—slow-motion, rack focus on blades of grass, fences silhouetted against the morning sky, gorgeous vistas of horses grazing before the ocean—Song of the Horse lacks momentum. The impeccable rhythm and quintessential joining of shots for which Kurosawa is renowned is absent and, without a story to fall back on, the movie becomes one of the few genuinely dull entries in his career.
There are, however, a few discussions to be had on how Song of the Horse relates to Kurosawa’s life and career—beginning with the music. Masaru Sato had been the director’s regular composer since the mid-1950s, starting when he finished the score for Record of a Living Being (1955) after Fumio Hayasaka (Sato’s mentor) died of tuberculosis. He went on to compose for all of Kurosawa’s subsequent endeavors in the ‘50s and ‘60s, turning out a plethora of OSTs ranging from colorful and energetic—Yojimbo—to disturbing and atmospheric—Throne of Blood (1957). Having surrendered the baton to Toru Takemitsu for Dodesukaden, Sato returned for the little-known Song of the Horse and delivered a soothing score (performed by the Tokyo Chamber Orchestra) reverent for the animals on screen. In addition to drums and string instruments, he employs subtle touches (such as the aforementioned clattering of bells when the baby horse learns to stand), and his music is arguably the picture’s most appealing quality.
Alas, Song of the Horse marked Sato and Kurosawa’s final collaboration, as their partnership became one of many casualties suffered during the chaotic, unhappy making of Kagemusha (1980). Sato initially agreed to score this epic about a thief who becomes the body double for a feudal warlord, but creative differences caused him to walk before post-production. Shinichiro Ikebe ultimately scored the film, and Sato never worked with Kurosawa again.15
Perhaps the last noteworthy aspect to Song of the Horse is how it preluded the most infamous event in Akira Kurosawa’s life. On the morning of December 22, 1971—less than four months after the film broadcast on NTV—Kurosawa’s maid heard the water in his bathroom running loudly and found the director with slash marks across his throat and wrists. (“Later,” recalled Kurosawa’s nephew Mike Inoue, “he said the reason he had drained the tub was that he did not want his family to see all the bloody water. Luckily, because he did that, she heard him.”)16 Kurosawa recovered and two years later received yet another offer to make a film overseas. This one came to fruition, and the Russian language Dersu Uzala (1975) ended up being one of the most beautiful and engrossing pictures of his later career.
Kurosawa directed five movies after Dersu Uzala and never in that time disclosed the reason behind his 1971 suicide attempt. Some have suggested that he’d feared his career was over, due to the collapse of Runaway Train, the damage inflicted on his reputation by the Tora! Tora! Tora! debacle, and—we might speculate—the fact that a TV documentary was the only job he could land after the disappointment of Dodesukaden. But whether any of this was on Kurosawa’s mind when he slashed his throat and wrists constitutes mere speculation. In an interview with the Criterion Collection, script supervisor Teruyo Nogami remembered: “[W]hen we traveled to the USSR [for Dersu Uzala], foreign reporters had no compunction about asking Kurosawa straight out why he’d wanted to kill himself. He always answered the same way: ‘At the time, I couldn’t bear to go on living, not for one more minute or second.’ What made his life so unbearable he never said.”17
Notes and citations:
I am counting only the movies on which Kurosawa was the sole director and which he considered part of his official filmography. Films based on his screenplays but directed by others are not taken into account; nor are pictures of which he only handled segments, such as Kajiro Yamamoto’s Horse (1941) or the Toho labor union movie Those Who Make Tomorrow (1946).
Galbraith, Stuart, IV. The Emperor and the Wolf: The Lives and Films of Akira Kurosawa and Toshiro Mifune. New York: Faber & Faber, 2002, p. 441
Ibid
Ibid, pp. 444-48
Ibid, pp. 449-58
In 1953, the cheapest TV set in Japan cost roughly ¥175,000. By 1958, however, the price had dropped to ¥60,000, and the number of sets in Japan had grown from 866 to over 1.5 million. Source: Chun, Jayson Makoto. A Nation of a Hundred Million Idiots?: A Social History of Japanese Television, 1953 – 1973. New York: Routledge, 2006
Galbraith, Stuart, IV. The Japanese Filmography: A Complete Reference Work to 209 Filmmakers and the More Than 1250 Films Released in the United States, 1900-1994. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, Inc., 1996, p. 471
Bock, Audie. Japanese Film Directors. New York: Kodansha International, Ltd., 1978, p. 205
Ibid, p. 247
Galbraith, The Emperor and the Wolf, p. 487
Ibid, p. 474
Ibid, p. 486
Crist, Judith. “Uneasy Rider.” New York vol. 4, no. 11, 11 October 1971, p. 67
The credits list Kurosawa’s company, Kurosawa Production, as co-producer.
Galbraith, The Emperor and the Wolf, p. 559
Ibid, p. 487
“A Conversation with Teruyo Nogami.” Translated by Juliet Winters Carpenter. Dodes’ka-den, The Criterion Collection DVD booklet, 2009, p. 18