Will our collective fascination with serial killers ever fizzle? Based on how many people watched the latest installment of Netflix’s Conversations with a Killer series, it’s highly unlikely.
Tackling the notorious David Berkowitz, known as Son of Sam, the docuseries is currently a top 10 show in 20 countries where the streaming service is available. It also gathered 1.7 million views in the last week alone, proving that the true crime genre still has a hold on audiences worldwide.
Could this mean more similar content is on the way?
Conversations with a Killer: The Son of Sam Tapes Season 2 Release Date
At the time of writing, there’s no official news on a potential Conversations with a Killer: The Son of Sam Tapes season 2. That said, the series will probably continue to profile other killers.
The Son of Sam Tapes is the fourth chapter in the Conversations with a Killer series. Previous installments focus on Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, and John Wayne Gacy.
While we might have to wait a couple of years for a fresh batch of episodes, it will be worth it. So far, each new entry in the franchise has been equal parts disturbing and illuminating.
The Son of Sam Tapes Cast
Mary Murphy
Joseph Borrelli
Jack Jones
Lawrence Klausner
Manny Grossman
Marlin Hopkins
Richard Edmonds
What Is Conversations with a Killer: The Son of Sam Tapes About?
This gripping docuseries offers an unsettling look into one of America’s most infamous serial killers.
Over the course of three episodes, this installment in the Conversations with a Killer anthology revisits the 1976–1977 terror inflicted on New York by David Berkowitz, known as the Son of Sam.
The series delivers audio interviews, present-day reflections from reliable sources, and archival information. Together, the mix allows viewers to delve deeper into Berkowitz’s psyche, as well as understand the societal impact of his crimes.
We learn more about Berkowitz’s troubled upbringing and the motivations behind the killings. Additionally, the docuseries offers a comprehensive analysis of his mindset, while also explaining how the case became a touchstone for modern true crime.
If you’re interested in the genre, it’s a must-watch for sure.
Are There Other Shows Like Conversations with a Killer?
Conversations with a Killer: The Son of Sam season 2 might not become a thing. But if you found this installment interesting, there’s a good chance you’ll enjoy the rest of the anthology.
“I never lie in my songs,” Cass McCombs repeats on ‘I Never Dream About Trains’, a highlight from Interior Live Oak, his 11th album, which means he has certainly released over a hundred. Lest you take his words at face value, the odd specificity of the ensuing lyrics should elicit some skepticism (“I never dream about holding you tight/ On the sand in Pescadero”). What he sings on the previous song, though, is much closer to the truth: “I mean everything I say, or something quite like it.” The meaning of Interior Live Oak, a 12-song double album that follows 2022’s excellent but much more concise Heartmind, remains elusive, but McCombs manages to weave it all together, singing through a cast of unreliable narrators that only cement his own musical consistency and earnestness. They are dancers and cynics, real and imagined, brutally honest and spiritually truth-bearing. If they all, at times, seem buried in sleep, that’s because dreams, they say, have no lies to hide.
1. Priestess
One of two songs produced with Sam Owens (aka Sam Evian), ‘Priestess’ is an elegy – “of sorts,” the press bio aptly clarifies – for a friend, though the lyrics are as cryptically phantasmagoric as the hook is tight. “You saw that each one of us/ Are opaque as woven air/ Your dark humor no one could touch,” McCombs sings, capturing a whiff of it, but too intimate to be brutally honest.
2. Peace
Introduced by an exquisite acoustic riff and ending with a scruffy guitar solo, ‘Peace’ feels like a warm extension of ‘Priestess’ – both were advance singles – fixating on the word we use to bid farewell. It’s not so much about being fearless in the face of death so much as embracing fear amidst certainty.
3. Missionary Bell
With death still on his mind, McCombs gets more earnest and philosophical, his acoustic guitar playing simpler. As he lingers on the metaphor of “fathomless oceans,” his stately melody is the opposite of discordant, carrying you gently along. There are no bad songs on Interior Live Oak, but few as understated, and none better.
4. Miss Mabee
McCombs breaks the mood with a chugging, playful song that relies on the titular bit of wordplay (“Maybe Miss Mabee will, maybe Miss Mabee won’t”). Not much more to offer, but it does its job.
5. Home at Last
McCombs keeps things humorous with ‘Home at Last’, only this time it’s moodily self-deprecating. He’s aware of having to make a double album cohere instead of feeling like a disparate collection of songs, and it comes through even in the subtlest lyrical decisions: “Greeted by the hand of my maker/ I will shake it a lot/ Maybe some old streetlamp will blink once for me/ Maybe not.” Mr. Mabee, perhaps?
6. I’m Not Ashamed
Returning to unadorned, nostalgic sweetness, the narrator digs up a past without shame – a childhood where he’d climb on top of cherry trees, threatened by teeth-baring clouds – and projects it onto the present. If only the course of our lives could feel so weightless and pure; something’s lost in growing up, but maybe we can learn from it.
7. Who Removed the Cellar Door?
Widening the scope of the album, ‘Who Removed the Cellar Door?’ is quite a filmic interrogation of the titular prompt, with a strong melody that makes it easy to follow the narrative. Co-producer and longtime collaborator Chris Cohen helps create an ominous atmosphere, weaving the song around wafts of guitar and low-end fuzz.
8. A Girl Named Dogie
After ‘Miss Mabee’ we get ‘A Girl Named Dogie’, which maintains the previous song’s brooding atmosphere. The premise is familiar: the girl moved to New York “from somewhere hella plain,” though McCombs takes that line in a surreal direction by rhyming it with “and brought with her the rain.” Aided by Jason Quever, the song is sparser and drenched in reverb rather than layers of instrumentation, unexpectedly lighting up as if to illuminate the dark stage where the girl dreams herself a star. To match the glammy guitar solo he somehow finds space for, McCombs then starts yodelling. Just in case you’re starting to drift off.
9. Asphodel
Anchored by a driving guitar line and fluid drumming, ‘Asphodel’ is generous towards mysticism, neither ridiculing nor indulging in it. It revolves around a portal beneath San Francisco’s TransAmerica Pyramid leading to the city’s dark underworld – and where, a junkie informs the narrator, a flower grows in the dark. He juxtaposes fantastical details with incontrovertible truths: “The oak is alive by what is buried underneath.” His tone ultimately, once again, becomes elegiac, the flower harnessed for its figurative power, a spiritual warmth not even a cynic could deny.
10. I Never Dream About Trains
The suspiciously titled ‘I Never Dream About Trains’ is made all the more ironic by McCombs’ sensitive delivery: “Having cooled all desire/ I don’t require a thing from the Fates.” Maybe the latter line is true, but desire shows no signs of cooling. Maybe you can’t waltz loss away, but you can sort of wink at it.
11. Van Wyck Expressway
In another instance of smart sequencing, the desire is plainly revealed, if rather ambivalent: “I want something I can’t have/ I have something I don’t want.” ‘Van Wyck Expressway’ houses one of the album’s most mesmerizing melodies, swayed by fingerpicked guitar and cello that complement McCombs’ hushed vocals. “Human life is sleeping life,” he sings. Yet he can’t escape the vestiges of his own experience, laid out there in the dreams.
12. Lola Montez Danced the Spider Dance
Another cinematic song in the vein of ‘Who Removed the Cellar Door?’, this one stretches over seven minutes and centers on the Irish woman who became famous as a Spanish dancer (and whose list of lovers included pianist Franz Liszt and novelist Alexandre Dumas). Soundtracking her “final dance of desire,” the song is slow-moving but could use a few more textures to justify its length. Fictional as it may be, it inadvertently encapsulates the themes of the album in a couple of lines: “Unpleasant dreams, dark desires/ Poisoned spirits and flying embers.”
13. Juvenile
If ‘Miss Mabee’ was playful, ‘Juvenile’ is downright goofy, adopting the perspective of the adolescent as much as it is admonishing him. Primus catch a stray among the things that suck (everything), while the singer cautions against advertising that promotes the power of the new: “New map/ New crap/ New music/ That don’t slap.” Except Interior Live Oak, of course. McCombs knows he’s not saying anything new, but it still slaps.
14. Diamonds in the Mine
‘Diamonds in the Mine’ feels like a breath of fresh air at this point in the tracklist, lighthearted and comforting. Darkness is coming, he admits, but there’s no need to fear it because nothing stays the same. It’s a simple message, but Sam Owens does a wonderful job colouring in the spectral arrangement. “Glimmer adieu,” turns out, is just another way to say peace.
15. Strawberry Moon
The night has come, and as all lovers (our narrator included) gravitate towards the same titular beauty, McCombs offers them another waltz. When the city sleeps is when the music comes alive.
16. Interior Live Oak
If Interior Live Oak is a sleepy (complimentary) record, McCombs finishes it off with its rowdiest track, drunk on thunderous riffs and double-time drumming. If you’ve just woken up, it makes you want to fall back into the slumber, just to remember what the dreams were all about.
In this segment, we showcase the most notable albums out each week. Here are the albums out on August 15, 2025:
Cass McCombs, Interior Live Oak
Cass McCombs has returned with his first solo studio album in three years, Interior Live Oak. The wondrously contemplative follow-up to 2022’s Heartmind finds the singer-songwriter returning to his longtime label home of Domino, following a series of albums with ANTI-, and was previewed by the singles ‘Priestess’, ‘Peace’, and ‘I Never Dream About Trains’. Inspired by his return to the label as well as last year’s reissue campaign, McCombs revisited the economical approach of his earlier songwriting, working with past collaborators such as Jason Quever (Papercuts) and Chris Cohen.
Dijon’s bold, fiery, buoyant new album Baby has arrived, just a week after it was announced. It’s his first album in nearly four years, following Absolutely, though he’s recently contributed to a streams of records including Bon Iver’s SABLE, fABLE, Justin Bieber’s Swag, and Mk.gee’s Two Star & the Dream Police. The record was mostly made at home, in isolation with Dijon’s new family, with help from Andrew Sarlo, Henry Kwapis, and Michael Gordon.
Pile waste no time charging into their ninth album, Sunshine and Balance Beams, their first with Sooper Records. Relentlessly foreboding and epic in scope, the record journeys towards acceptance: “of oneself, one’s environment, and one’s limits,” per a press release. Founder Rick Maguire elaborated: “I’ve used ambition and daydreaming as a motivator for as long as I can remember, and I still do. The fulfillment I receive from pursuing art has been a guiding force for me, but it can be damaging when that pursuit teases capitalist expectations of where you might be able to go and then doesn’t square with the reality that follows. I tried to write this as a story.”
Chance the Rapper has self-released his first LP since 2019’s The Big Day. Crafted with longtime producer DexLvL, Star Line features guest spots from Lil Wayne and Smino (on the early single ‘Tree’), Vic Mensa, Jamila Woods, BJ the Chicago Kid, Joey Bada$$, Jazmine Sullivan, Young Thug, and TiaCorine. It was informed by the rapper’s travels to Ghana, Jamaica, and art fairs around the world.
Anxiety-ridden yet breezy, mathy yet melodic, Easier Said Than Done is Pool Kids’ most ambitiously pop-leaning effort to date. The Tallahassee band’s third album follows their 2022 self-titled LP and features the advance tracks ‘Leona Street’, ‘Sorry Not Sorry’, and the title track. “There’s a lot of Florida imagery and a lot of really specific glimpses from tour on this album,” Christine Goodwyne said of her lyrical approach. “By letting myself get specific, I feel a lot more emotionally connected to the songs. It’s a very personal record for me and for the whole band, too. I was writing about what life has been like for all of us over the last few years. I feel like all of us can relate to a lot of the songs.”
There’s nothing quite like Marissa Nadler’s dreamlike, darkly enchanting songs, and her new album New Radiations is no exception. Here, the singer-songwriter takes its hauntedness to the next level by enlisting mixing engineer Randall Dunn for an entirely percussionless, droning kind of Americana. “Psychic vibrations and new radiations have taken their toll on me,” Nadler sings on the title track, yet compels you to stay attuned. Along with ‘New Radiations’, the record was preceded by ‘Hatchet Man’ and ‘Light Years’.
Kaytranada has dropped a new album, Ain’t No Damn Way!. Marking the Canadian DJ and producer’s first new original music since 2024’s Timeless, the record is billed as “an intentional return to his dance music roots.” In an Instagram story earlier this week, Kaytranada said, “Letting y’all know that this album is strictly for workouts, dancing and studying and for my people that love beats.” He also shared the single ‘Space Invader’.
Fans of Black Country, New Road will find a lot to like on Racing Mount Pleasant, the self-titled debut album by the Michigan seven-piece formerly known as Kingfisher. It opens with ‘Your New Place’, a 7-minute track that swells and shapeshifts in vivid, heart-wrenching fashion. The song previewed the album along with the previously unveiled ‘Call It Easy’ and the title track, and there are a lot more gems to be found in it.
Steve Gunn, Music For Writers; Alison Goldfrapp, Flux; Black Honey, Soak; Conan Gray, Wishbone; Molly Tuttle, So Long Little Miss Sunshine; Maroon 5, Love is Like; Rise Against, Ricochet; Joseph Decosimo, Fiery Gizzard; Babyface Ray, Codeine Cowboy; Protect, 500 Days of Summer; Ganser, Animal Hospital; Audrey Hobart, Who’s the Clown?; Hit Boy, Software Update; Evidence, Unlearning Vol. 2; Fletcher Tucker, Kin; ROSIE, City Woman; Recoechi, Flavaz; Hussain Bokhari, Possessions; The Crabs, Years at the Unknown; Garage Sale, Any Day Now; Jordan Davis, Learn the Hard Way; Christina Carter, Like a Bayou to Its Gulf.
Steve Lacy has returned with a new song, ‘Nice Shoes’. Written and produced by Lacy, it marks his first new music as lead artist in three years. Check it out below.
In an interview with Rolling Stone, Lacy described ‘Nice Shoes’ as “a ‘trailer’ for this new moment in his career.” He also revealed the follow-up to 2022’s Gemini Rights is called Oh Yeah?. “This one has taken a lot of time and thought,” he said. “I keep using the word ‘design.’ It feels like fully designing a new language for myself.”
On the new single, which features some dizzying switch-ups, that language includes lines like, “My dick is getting hard again/ At the thought of you and me holding hands.” Lacy produced it with Nick Weiss (Nightfeelings) and Matthew Castellanos.
Cardi B has released a new song, ‘Imaginary Playerz’, the latest single from her sophomore album Am I the Drama? The track, produced by DJ SwanQo, OctaneThisThatGas, and Sean Island, interpolates Jay-Z’s ‘Imaginary Players’, and it’s accompanied by a video Cardi B directed with Patientce Foster. Check it out below.
Am I the Drama? arrives on September 19. It’s set to feature ‘WAP’, ‘Up’, and ‘Outside’.
Classic fragrances are capturing the imagination of modern consumers, bridging generations through their enduring allure. As the fashion world embraces nostalgia, vintage scents are becoming a mainstay in contemporary culture. Dior-inspired perfumes serve as shining examples of how timeless elegance can be seamlessly woven into today’s trends.
The charm of classic fragrances is experiencing a remarkable revival in contemporary culture. With their rich histories and captivating aromas, these scents are making a powerful comeback. Enthusiasts and newcomers alike find themselves drawn to Dior-inspired perfumes that evoke memories of elegance and sophistication. As the appreciation for vintage aesthetics grows, so does the demand for fragrances that encapsulate this nostalgic essence.
The historical significance of classic fragrances
The historical significance of classic fragrances cannot be overstated. Perfumes have been woven into the tapestry of culture for centuries, each bottle telling its own story. These scents carry with them a legacy of artistry, craftsmanship, and luxury that resonates deeply with today’s audiences. In an age where authenticity is prized, the rich heritage behind these timeless aromas offers a sense of connection to the past.
Perfumes from decades past were crafted with meticulous attention to detail, often using rare and precious ingredients. This dedication to quality has allowed them to stand the test of time. Their enduring appeal lies in their ability to transport wearers to another era while still remaining relevant in modern contexts. It’s no wonder that these fragrances continue to captivate perfume aficionados around the globe.
As cultural symbols, classic perfumes offer more than just scent; they represent moments in history and iconic figures who have worn them. From Hollywood starlets to European royalty, these fragrances have adorned influential personalities throughout time. This association with elegance and prestige further fuels their popularity among contemporary consumers seeking a touch of glamour in their daily lives.
Modern interpretations of vintage scents
In recent years, there has been a concerted effort to reinterpret vintage fragrances for modern audiences. Perfumers are reimagining these classics by incorporating contemporary notes while preserving their original essence. This delicate balance ensures that new iterations retain the same allure as their predecessors but appeal to evolving tastes and preferences.
For instance, Dior-inspired perfumes have been reimagined to include modern twists while maintaining their classic charm. These fragrances blend traditional floral and citrus notes with unexpected ingredients like pink pepper or oud, creating a fresh yet familiar scent profile that resonates with today’s consumers. The resurgence of classic scents is evident not only in individual perfume collections but also within broader fashion trends. Designers draw inspiration from these timeless aromas when creating new lines or revamping existing ones. This interplay between fragrance and fashion creates a harmonious blend where scent becomes an integral part of personal style expression.
Retailers are also responding to this trend by offering curated selections of vintage-inspired perfumes alongside newer offerings. By doing so, they cater to consumers who appreciate both tradition and innovation—a demographic eager for olfactory experiences that transcend conventional boundaries.
Influence of classic fragrances on modern fashion
The impact of classic fragrances on modern fashion is undeniable. These scents influence designers’ creative processes as they seek ways to incorporate elements reminiscent of iconic eras into contemporary collections. Whether it’s through fabric choices or color palettes inspired by renowned perfumes’ packaging designs—fragrance plays an essential role in shaping today’s sartorial landscape.
Dior-inspired perfumes exemplify how powerful this influence can be when executed thoughtfully within fashion circles worldwide; seamlessly blending nostalgia with cutting-edge design concepts—a testament to perfume’s transformative power across industries beyond its own realm alone!
As consumers become increasingly discerning about personal expression through style choices—fragrance serves as an invisible accessory enhancing overall appearance without overshadowing other aspects entirely—a subtle yet significant contribution towards achieving desired aesthetic outcomes every day without fail!
Teethe is a Southern slowcore band composed of Boone Patrello, Grahm Robinson, Madeline Dowd, and Jordan Garrett. Though they were occupying the same DIY spaces in Denton, Texas, the four members were part of various projects that accidentally converged into what they would call Teethe. Patrello had his band Dead Sullivan; Dowd started a project named Crisman, which Garrett joined; Robinson had MAH KEE OH. Sharing song ideas and fragments that didn’t fit into those projects, they ended up with their 2020 self-titled debut, which showcased not just a gift for melody but a willingness to sink you into it. For their mesmerizing second album, Magic of the Sale, the band’s recording process, split between their current home bases across Dallas and Austin, stayed virtually unchanged: tracking demos and uploading them to a shared folder. This time, though, the group of trusted contributors that helped bring to life their tender-hearted melancholy and warm existentialism widened: Charlie Martin of Hovvdy, performing additional piano; Wednesday/MJ Lenderman’s Xandy Chelmis on pedal steel, producer Logan Hornyak of Melaina Kol, and Emily Elkin on cello. “Hear your words like photos felt in sound,” a muffled voice sings on ‘Iron Wine’, stirring a wave of distortion. “Holding what our eyes can’t make up now.” Magic of the Sale sounds like slowing down the blink of an eye, where the smallest, most precious emotions seep into view.
We caught up with Teethe for the latest edition of our Artist Spotlight series to talk about the origins of the band, weaving together Magic of the Sale, the album’s lyrical perspectives, and more.
Boone and Madeline, take me back to when you first met at the University of North Texas. Do you remember what your first impressions of each other were like?
Boone Patrello: We met at freshman orientation. We just had similar musical interests, and we shared music with each other, and then we started making music together.
Madeline Dowd: I’d seen Boone around before orientation, but then we really got to talking on that first day of school, which is kind of funny to think about. We just started hanging out – I was recording my own music, and Boone was doing that too. It was really cool to find someone right off the bat and pretty much dive into that world. Boone showed me a lot of cool music that was really inspiring to me at that time. The whole scene in college of DIY and playing house shows, everything just fit into place.
I know there are several different projects that led and coalesced into Teeth. Is there a moment you can point to where Teethe felt like a distinct entity?
Jordan Garrett: In terms of the inception of the band, it wasn’t really a band formally; it was more of a recording project that then necessitated a band. We were asked to play a couple of shows with our friend, Alex of Alexalone, and that was what got us to play the songs live, thinking about more than just the album and recording.
MD: I think about the time that Teethe formed and I feel like it was kind of the perfect time that we made a collaborative project. College had ended, and everyone starts going their own ways, and then we made this project that almost kept us together, collaborating and still involved after that phase of life.
BP: The actual album itself had an inception of just songs that we had worked on together with no end goal. Just a handful of tracks we had collaborated on totally spontaneously.
How do you look back on piecing together that album?
BP: I have random memories of putting the record together, going back and forth with everybody. There were songs that we thought were really good, but it was like, “This isn’t for this solo project.” And then I remember scrounging through the hard drive and there were seven songs, putting those under a SoundCloud playlist, and then it became 12 songs. I remember lying on the floor and just listening to it from start to finish, and I was like, “Damn, this shit’s actually really good.” And then everybody else was saying the same thing.
JG: It’s funny that way because that album in particular feels like a bunch of B-sides from out.
MD: It’s cool that our first album came from the necessity of wanting to just make something. Because there was no intention, it was just from something pure, of just enjoying making music and keeping alive what we were doing in college.
With Magic of the Sale, it feels like you’re trying to preserve part, even though there’s more intentionality and a bigger sound. You didn’t work with an outside producer, for example, but you brought in a number of collaborators. How conscious of an effort was that?
BP: We didn’t change the way that we made the record at all. It is a conscious effort to choose not to go to a studio or hire a mix engineer, but it’s not like we took steps backwards. We have better gear and equipment and probably have gotten better at recording and mixing. It feels really natural, and it’s just the way we’ve always made music. But then there are elements of it where it was a conscious thing, even with the track listing and sequencing and stuff. It was using the first record as a template and not being too OCD about it.
MD: I feel like the first album is a tighter crop or a zoomed-in version of the second. Our second album, even with the artwork, I feel like zooms out and you get to see into the world. It feels the same, but it’s just so many more layers. Yeah, keeping the same template but expanding on it.
What was the process behind the cover art for Magic of the Sale? Was it something you conceptualized with the group?
MD: I just went in with the same mindset as the first record.
BP: And all the same tools and mediums, right?
MD: Yeah. The same way of thinking about it: listening to the music, going from the feeling of that, and recreating that character in a different setting. There weren’t really any stipulations around what I needed to do, which was nice.
When you were sharing ideas in a folder this time around, did you find yourselves falling into a different kind of rhythm?
JG: At least for me, it was very similar to the first LP. We would just share these songs, and then it would either be suggested that somebody add something, or more often than not, we would take the bones that were there and throw something on it. Then we’d put it back in and everybody would be like, “Okay, this is the song now.” It was very similar to that process, except we have a team behind us, so there is this notion that we’re presenting something, whereas the first LP was kind of our pet project. As Boone mentioned, we’ve just gotten better equipment and hopefully better at recording and presenting the ideas.
Grahm Robinson: Also, over time, we’ve all really learned each other’s strengths, so if I’m making a song, I automatically will know, “Oh, Maddie will sound really good on this part,” or “I’m going to send this to Boone because I know he’s gonna play slide guitar over this.” We’ve just gotten really good at knowing how to fit the pieces together on our songs.
Maddie, I noticed a couple of songs you sing lead on are on the rockier, more upbeat side.
MD: It’s kinda nice because even on the first record, there’s a few songs that are more upbeat in that way. Then with this second record, allowing there to be less of a confinement on the Teeth sound, staying in one box – it was fun to have some of those tracks where we experimented more with the sounds being heavier.
BP: ‘Holy Water’, one of Maddie’s songs, was actually a pretty chill demo, and then we turned it into a heavier rock song. But not for any particular reason – just thought it would sound cool.
Is the process usually more about filling out songs as opposed to subtracting or changing things?
BP: It’s definitely more of a maximal approach of just throwing everything at the song and seeing what sticks. More often than not, whether it takes the front seat or gets pushed down in the mix, most everything can work in the song. Whether it becomes really textural and quiet or whether it’s the lead line, this record feels like everything but the kitchen sink in terms of instrumentation and melody.
MD: I remember when you got a lot of stuff back from our collaborators, sending everything they could possibly do, and then you sifting through, picking and choosing what you wanted.
BP: It still was super intentional with those parts. It’s not just playing something and being like, “Sounds good.” It’s fitting as much as possible into every little part and just seeing everything through to its fullest potential. So yeah, I guess it’s additive, but then at the end you strip back and see what makes the most sense, but more of an additive thing.
Were you more selective with the additional instrumentation?
BP: The strings and the flutes were already baked in digitally, we just had them recorded, live. But with the people who played their own stuff, like the piano and the pedal steel and some of the additional production, that stuff was woven in around the songs that we had already fleshed out at 80% or something. There were some moments where it was almost like, “Is this getting in the way of what we already did? Is this distracting from us as a band?” But then it ultimately felt like it kept elevating and making the songs something more grand.
JG: All the collaborators are obviously people we respect a lot and value their musical opinions, so it was very easy for them to get their hands on it, and we could just take the back seat and let them do their thing.
BP: They all either make music or are in great bands that we like too, so it was easy to trust those people.
Was there a cello or a pedal steel part that you heard, and it really made a song click for you?
BP: I remember getting the cello parts back and just being mind blown. We had had the digital strings and thought that they might pass, but then once we got the actual strings, it was like, “Holy shit. This is awesome.”
JG: At our last rehearsal, Boone had soloed out the cello part and the drum parts, and we were just trying to figure out how to play some of the songs in a live setting. And just listening to those isolated, we were like, “This could be its own thing.” It’s very rich in that way.
BP: Yeah. And I remember getting the pedal steel parts back. Despite being kind of overwhelmed by the sheer amount of additional material to try to fit into the record, there are some parts where Xandy’s pedal steel is like, “Whoa.” There are certain aspects of the record where it’s things that we wouldn’t have been able to achieve on our own. It just feels more complete. There was one song, ‘Funny’, I completely restructured around one of Charlie’s piano parts; it was a song that I was kind of insecure about, and then once he played piano on it, I took what he did on the second half of the son and put it back on the first, st and and made it like the foundation of the song. And then I loved the song.
At this point, how do you see the relationship between Boone and Maddie’s voices? How do you feel like that dynamic works in these songs?
MD: I never really thought about it too much till our last show where someone had made a comment about it, but I just think it’s cool to have a conversation back and forth vocally. Obviously, because we’re dating too, I feel like it’s pretty natural. It’s kind of fun in some of the songs to realize that there’s a conversation happening intuitively.
BP: Whether it’s me singing or Graham or Maddie, I think it always sounds cool with a male and female voice. Doubling that is always cool, but because there’s multiple people writing lyrics, there’s a lot of moments or opportunity for the call and response type vocals, or for two speakers to be wrapped up in the same theme.
Graham, what appeals to you about this kind of lyric-writing process that’s different from how you share ideas sonically?
GR: I think generally, my lyrics tend to be really, really simple and not hiding anything. Boone’s lyrics tend to be pretty poetic and metaphorical and stuff, and I think that contrast is pretty interesting. Thematically, it can be cool to pass a song off to somebody else because they might add lyrics in a section that I didn’t even think to add lyrics to, and it opens up a whole new alternate perspective into that theme of the song.
MD: I feel like because we all write separately in our own rooms alone, it feels natural and you can be vulnerable. You can think about what you’re saying or how you’re feeling and then bring it to everyone. Everyone adding from there feels pretty comfortable.
The phrase “gentle like Jesus” from ‘Push You Forever’ somehow feels evocative of the whole album. Not that there’s something overtly religious about it beyond some of the imagery, but this almost spiritual tenderness feels precious to the record.
BP: I think there’s an exploration of spirituality for sure. Without being like, “Oh, this part’s about this thing,” I think it’s all-encompassing.
GR: Obviously, there’s a bit of religious imagery, but I don’t think any one of us is really super religious. But I do think it’s some kind of reflection of where we’re from, in a way. In Texas, at least where I grew up, there’s a church on every corner and you just can’t really avoid that.
BP: It’s baked in, for sure. We’re all steeped in it.
MD: Even outside the religious umbrella, I think there’s overarching elements of grasping for some bigger understanding or bigger picture outside of ourselves.
The record seems to look back on a lot of childhood innocence and playfulness, too. I’m curious if you sometimes talk about lyrics or trade memories that maybe seep into songs.
MD: I would say it’s pretty separate, which is interesting. Once it’s all done, that’s when I can really look at it and be like, “Wow, this is what is being said,” without even really having to look at each other and be like, “This is what we’re talking about.” It just feels pretty intuitive and unspoken.
Boone, I read that stitching together songs took four months. I don’t know how much of it intersected with the recording process, but was it all-consuming and isolating in its own way?
I would say it did feel like a separate time because we had to draw a line in the sand and be like, “Okay, we’re done recording.” We did have to define the time and be like, “It’s time to start mixing it.” But yeah, it was brutal. I really love mixing, it’s one of my favorite things to do. But it can only be so fun because it’s just so much material, and it was also tough to be like, “The mixes are done.” I was just putting it through all the speakers I own and making a bunch of notes and going through rounds of mixing. It’s the same with any mix – eventually, you’re like, “Okay, it sounds good enough.” Once you listen through the whole song without having the urge to pause and start tweaking stuff, it’s like, “I guess it’s done.”
How did everyone else feel during that period?
JG: I just didn’t want Boone to pull his hair out. [laughs] That’s a long process. But obviously, we trusted him to do justice to the songs.
MD: I feel like being in the same house as Boone while he was doing that – he was just locked away in the chamber of mixing.
BP: I also moved back to my mom’s and worked on it for a few months there, too. It was funny because I think they all probably heard the record 300 times. I would mix on monitors mostly, but at my mom’s house, the walls are paper-thin, and anybody in the house would have heard every little aspect of what I was doing. They got to hear it all. But I don’t think it would have made sense to have somebody else mix it, just for the sheer amount of material. It would have just not worked. I remember thinking, why would we have spent this much time learning how to make music and specifically mixing to ultimately get to this point where this record feels something important to us, and then be like, “Now I’m going to send it off to somebody else”? I felt like I’d ironed out these skills, so I might as well put them to use.
Do you feel like that’s the way to go, moving forward?
BP: Sometimes I do listen to the record, and I’m like, “Shit, maybe this mix isn’t so great.” I’ll probably always be doing that, but I don’t know. I think it would just have to be approaching making the songs differently, too, with the idea in mind that somebody else is going to mix it, and that might fuck stuff up. Ideally, we could just keep doing it how we’ve always done it.
This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity and length.
Trace Mountains and Teen Suicide have shared their contributions to I Will Swim to You: A Tribute to Jason Molina, which was recently announced by Run For Cover Records. Following MJ Lenderman’s cover of ‘Just Be Simple’ and Sun June’s take on ‘Leave The City’ Trace Mountains and Teen Suicide have tackled ‘The Dark Don’t Hide It’ and ‘Whip Poor Will’, respectively. Take a listen below.
“I first heard about Songs: Ohia and Magnolia Electric Co. when I was trying to find a label to put out my 2020 record Lost in the Country,” Dave Benton of Trace Mountains said in a press release. “An A&R I was chatting with said my songs reminded them of Jason’s and it prompted a dive into his catalogue that turned into a minor obsession with certain songs. The label conversation eventually fizzled out, but I was still glad to have discovered all Jason Molina’s wonderful music. ‘The Dark Don’t Hide It’ was always my favourite song of his, so when I was asked to contribute to this compilation I thought a piano-forward arrangement of the song might be kind of nice. So that’s what we did! Thanks for listening.”
Sam Ray of Teen Suicide had this to say:
Jason Molina’s music, particularly his records as Songs: Ohia, have been a huge part of my life. His music has gotten me through some of the very dark times in my life, and his songwriting has been immensely influential to me as well. I think the same could be said for a lot of our bandmates over the years, particularly Sean Mercer, who played with Teen Suicide for about seven or eight years. Soon after he joined the band full-time we started doing a cover of ‘Whip Poor Will’ at our shows. We’d play a version similar to the B-side from Magnolia Electric Co—stripped down to two guitars and nothing else, Sean would sing Molina’s lead, and I’d sing Jennie Benford’s.
When Run for Cover asked if we’d like to be part of a compilation honouring Molina’s music and legacy, I asked immediately if we could record a cover of it, hoping to capture the version we’d been playing for so many years. Thankfully we had a chance to reconvene and plan out our cover—doing it almost the same as before but now with the addition of Ahren Buchheisster playing the pedal steel as well. All these years later it’s still one of my favourite songs ever; I couldn’t be happier to have it be part of this wonderful compilation.
I Will Swim to You: A Tribute to Jason Molina comes out on September 5. It also features Hand Habits, Advance Base, Friendship, Horse Jumper of Love, Runnner, Another Michael, and more.
Lana Del Rey has shared a snippet of a diss track that apparently takes aim at Ethel Cain. The minute-long teaser, described as ‘Track 13’, opens with the line: “Ethel Cain hated my Instagram post.” Del Rey tagged Jack Antonoff – who, in addition to working on her upcoming album, was also involved in another big beef you might have heard about (what next? Clairo and Taylor Swift?) – on the post, which shows her sitting in a car while the music plays from the speakers.
Practically every line you hear in the snippet needs some context. Back in 2022, Lana Del Rey posted a photo with Salem’s Jack Donoghue, her ex-boyfriend, outside Cook County Jail. Fans are speculating this is the Instagram post Del Rey is referring to.
Del Rey follows that opening lyric with, “Think it’s cute reenacting my Chicago pose.” Cain once shared photo of herself on X/Twitter with Donoghue, though it may actually predate that by Del Rey. Later, the line “The most famous girl at the Waffle House” seems to reference a 2022 New York Times headline about Ethel Cain.
A snippet of another unreleased Lana Del Rey song, reportedly called ‘All About Ethel’, also leaked last year.
A few hours after Lana Del Rey posted the teaser, Ethel Cain said this on her Instagram story: “update: lana del rey has blocked ethel cain on instagram.” Cain herself has had some long-deleted tweets about Del Rey.
In an Instagram comment about the whole situation, Del Rey said: “I didn’t know who Ethel was until a few years ago — when someone brought to my attention the disturbing and graphic side-by-side images she would often put up of me next to unflattering creatures and cartoon characters making constant comments about my weight, I was confused at what she was getting at. Then when I heard what she was saying behind closed doors from mutual friends and started inserting herself into my personal life I was definitely disturbed.”
Outside of social media, Cain has not been shy about her thoughts on Lana. It’s no secret she doesn’t like being compared to Lana Del Rey. When I asked her about it back in 2021, before the breakout success of Preacher’s Daughter, she was still gracious enough to answer my question. “I definitely was hugely inspired by Lana when I was in high school; Born to Die I think was the very first CD that I ever bought,” she said. “At first when I listened to Born to Die I was like, ‘Wow, this is this really good American Dream, it’s so glamorous, it’s like old Hollywood,’ I loved it. But then as I got older, especially with the social justice movement and the unravelling of the American Dream, the unravelling of Hollywood, the unravelling of celebrity culture, it was kind of like, it’s all a sham. All that glamour and old opulence is built on the backs of hard-working people who will never get the recognition and it’s just a facade that you start to see through.”
Lana Del Rey elaborates on her lyrics about Ethel Cain, stating that the singer used to body-shame her:
“I didn’t know who Ethel was until a few years ago — when someone brought to my attention the disturbing and graphic side-by-side images she would often put up of me next to… pic.twitter.com/I6uV9UO6qU
If you’re seriously thinking about finding a Ukrainian bride, there’s a good chance you’re wondering: how much is this really going to cost me? Not just the flights or a one-time dating site fee, but everything. From the moment you sign up on a dating platform to the day you (hopefully) say “I do,” what should you realistically expect to spend?
The short answer? It’s not cheap. But also not insane if you plan wisely. We’ve broken it all down into categories so you can see exactly where your money might go—and where you can save.
1. Online Dating Sites: What You’ll Pay to Chat
Let’s start with dating sites because the Ukrainian brides profiles are what most men begin to browse when searching for a partner. These platforms usually work on a credit-based system. You buy credits or coins and use them to message, chat, send gifts, or video call.
On average, expect to spend between $150 and$400 per month if you chat regularly. The cost depends on how much you use features like live chat, video calls, or sending virtual and real gifts. Prices vary widely across platforms, but most charge per interaction, not per month.
Some men choose to invest more in the early stages, especially if they’re talking to multiple women or using video chat often. Others keep it minimal—focusing on deeper conversations with just one or two women and avoiding flashy add-ons.
How to save: Skip virtual gifts. They usually don’t add much value. Limit expensive features like video or voice calls until you’re sure the connection is strong. And be strategic with your first messages so you’re not burning through credits too quickly on dead-end chats.
What you can skip to save: Avoid sending virtual gifts, limit video calls unless things are serious, and make your first few messages count so you don’t end up spending $100 just getting to know someone who’s not a match.
2. Travel Expenses: Getting There (and Back Again)
At some point, if things go well, you’re going to want to meet in person. Ukraine isn’t exactly around the corner, so travel costs matter.
Here’s a rough breakdown of a one-week trip for one person to Ukraine:
Round-trip flight from the U.S. to Ukraine (or nearby country like Poland or Romania if flights to Ukraine are suspended): $700–$1,200
Hotel stay (7 nights): $40–100/night = $280–$700
Food & dining: $20/day = $140
Transportation (taxis, trains): $100
Dates & entertainment: $200–400 (depending on how fancy you go)
Estimated total: Around $1,500–$2,500 for a 7-day trip
That’s for a moderate trip. If you want to go all-out or travel more than once, expect to spend more. Some guys also choose to take their date to a neutral country for the first meeting, like Turkey or Czechia, which comes with its own price tag.
3. Gifts and Surprises: How Much Is Too Much?
Sending gifts is a nice gesture, especially when you’re building trust and showing genuine interest. But do you have to send flowers or teddy bears every other week? Absolutely not. Still, many men do spend on virtual and real gifts, especially if the platform makes it easy—and tempting.
Here’s what gifting might cost:
Virtual gifts: Usually range from $2 to $10 (but often feel a little meaningless, especially to Westerners)
Real gifts: Flowers, chocolates, or perfumes delivered to her door can cost $50 to $150 per item
High-end gestures: iPhones, jewelry, designer bags—yes, some sites offer these, and yes, they can run up to $500 or more
Gifts aren’t a requirement. But once you start getting serious, sending one real, thoughtful gift might mean more than a dozen emoji-laden teddy bear icons.
Estimated spend: Anywhere from $0 to $500+, depending on how extra you feel.
4. Visa and Legal Paperwork: The Final Hurdle
Let’s say things go really well, and you both decide to get married and live together in the U.S. (or your home country). Congrats! But now comes the less romantic part: government paperwork.
If you plan to bring your Ukrainian bride to the U.S., here’s what you’re looking at:
K-1 Fiancée visa filing: $535 (USCIS filing fee)
Medical exam: Around $200–300 (depends on country)
Embassy interview fees: ~$265
Translation and document fees: $100–200
Attorney (optional but helpful): $1,000–2,500
Estimated total: $1,100–3,500 depending on how much you handle yourself versus outsource
It’s not a huge number compared to wedding costs or years of rent, but it’s definitely something you need to plan ahead for. You don’t want your immigration paperwork to stall your relationship.
5. Wedding Costs: If You Go All the Way
This one’s a wildcard. Do you have a small ceremony in Ukraine with her family? A big bash in the U.S.? Both?
Here are a few versions:
Simple civil ceremony in Ukraine: $300–500
Moderate wedding in Ukraine (restaurant, dress, photographer): $2,000–4,000
Wedding in the U.S.: $5,000–15,000+ depending on the venue, guests, and how Pinterest-crazy you go
Some couples split the difference: one ceremony abroad, one celebration at home later. Either way, factor in the costs.
You might also need to fly her family in for a second ceremony—which adds more airfare and hotel costs to the bill.
Estimated total: Anywhere from $500 to $15,000+
6. Hidden Costs and Emotional Budgeting
Now let’s talk about the sneaky stuff—the costs that aren’t listed on any site or embassy form. The emotional investment, the time off work, the extra coffees while waiting for her to reply, the late-night video calls that make you zombie-walk through the next morning’s meeting.
You might pay for:
Gifts for her family when you visit (very common in Ukraine): $100–200
Extra clothes or grooming because, yes, you’ll want to look your best
Cultural prep: buying books, language learning apps, or even a short course on Slavic etiquette
Time off work to travel, handle paperwork, or just recover from jet lag
These don’t always show up on your credit card bill, but they’re real. The smartest approach is to not just budget money—budget energy and patience too.
Estimated total: $0–$1,000+ depending on how you roll and how much you prepare for that.
Final Thoughts: So… How Much Does It Really Cost?
If you add it all up, here’s a rough estimate of what a full journey might look like:
Dating sites (6 months average): $900–2,400
Travel (1–2 trips): $1,500–5,000
Gifts: $100–500 (or more if you’re generous)
Visa and legal: $1,100–3,500
Wedding(s): $500–15,000+
Hidden stuff: $0–1,000
Total range: Around $4,000 to $27,000+
That might sound like a lot, but consider this: people in your hometown spend that on weddings alone, or even on luxury honeymoons. This isn’t just about money—it’s about the life you’re building. And like any relationship, it’s an investment.
Just make sure it’s with the right person—because that’s the only part that really can’t be refunded.