Home Blog Page 1141

Album Review: Chat Pile, ‘God’s Country’

“It’s the sound of your world collapsing,” Raygun Busch repeats on the mid-paced ‘Anywhere’, somehow one of the few moments on God’s Country where his voice doesn’t sound incurably unhinged. Dumped right in the middle of all the filth that plagues the debut album from Oklahoma sludge metal trio Chat Pile, it’s a refrain that has no right being this catchy but that offers absolutely no reprieve from the unrelenting chaos the band has built their name on, using its hypnotic power only to drag you back in. This shit is terrifying and blood-curdlingly good – so raw in its intensity that the words can feel like a threat to the listener rather than a typically brutal depiction of murder. If you didn’t feel compelled to reject the album after the first shriek on opener ‘Slaughterhouse’, by this point your chances of getting out are pretty low.

But such is the scope of Chat Pile’s diatribe that you could easily replace “your world” with “the world.” It would also be in line with the band’s creative ambition, which bassist Stin has said is “to capture the anxiety and fear of seeing the world fall apart.” The sight of it, certainly, but also “the fuckin sound, man.” As much as Chat Pile have understandably earned comparisons to bands like the Jesus Lizard, Eyehategod, and even Korn, no one conjures this mental hellscape quite like them, thanks in large part to the grotesque dynamism of Busch’s vocals. There is a clarity and realism to their approach that renders it mercilessly human, far from the doomful, recycled visions of apocalyptic dystopia that pervade the genre. Take one of the songs I’ve quoted out of context, ‘Slaughterhouse’. While most heavy bands would reduce the immeasurable suffering that occurs in industrialized meat production to a cheap metaphor, Chat Pile are so tormented by the horrors we inflict on other beings that it becomes the song’s central, inescapable image: “The sad eyes, goddamnit/ And the screaming.”

In a twisted way, the simplicity of both the language and the messaging has the effect of amplifying its impact. As sickeningly direct as Busch’s delivery is – propelled by guitarist Luther Manhole’s pulverizing guitars and the poisoned, mechanical rot of Stin and Captain Ron’s rhythm section – it is also uniquely evocative. Plenty of noise acts have learned to sound like they’re playing in an abandoned factory; few portray what’s happening inside it with such ruthless precision. Yet it’s often because of what they leave out of the frame that the songs are so hideously unforgettable. The hopeless atmosphere of ‘Pamela’ is mirrored in its molten melodies, but it’s the ambiguous details of the story that make it so eerie, particularly since Busch’s spoken word delivery is so intimate you couldn’t tune it out if you tried. Musically, too, Chat Pile showcase remarkable restraint, taking the time to suck in all the toxicity that piles up. It’s no surprise the most devastating track on the album is the one in which Busch confesses to “think[ing] about killing you every day” over the crackling sound of fire.

As early as ‘Slaughterhouse’, Busch grounds his theatrical performance with a rare vulnerability that makes the demented perspectives he later embodies all the more harrowing. Not only have Chat Pile managed to refine the qualities that made them stand out on their two EPs, but also effectively utilize the space afforded by a full-length. It’s impossible not to align with Busch’s outlook when he cries out in despair on the first track, and then, addressing the epidemic of houselessness, on ‘Why’: “Why do people have to live outside?” The narrator is all too aware of the heartless exploitation of life that persists under capitalism, eliciting “a kind of rage you just never get used to.” And the more it fills him – the more he turns himself into the villain – the more difficult it is to separate the depravity of his behavior from the corrupt systems that facilitated it. “You weren’t supposed to see this,” Busch howls on the nightmarish nine-minute closing track, ‘grimace_smoking_weed.jpeg’, which could apply to any one of the abominable tragedies that unfold in God’s Country. “But here it is.” It’s too late now to turn a blind eye.

Five Frightful Films from Fantasia 2022

One of the biggest events in the annual calendar for genre fans, Fantasia International Film Festival comes to an end today after three weeks of screenings and events staged in venues across Montreal. We’ve been covering just some of this year’s batch of new horror, science fiction and cult films – including The Harbinger, Shin Ultraman and Cult Hero since the festival opened its doors on 14 July.

With Fantasia coming to a close for another year, read on for a round-up of five further films that you can catch up with at festivals or on streaming in the coming months.

Deadstream (2022) *****

Being a fan of found footage horror often feels like the only bit from The Godfather Part III (1990) that anyone ever remembers (apart from the helicopter): just when you think you’re out, they pull you back in. Horror-comedy Deadstream, written and directed by husband-and-wife team Joseph and Vanessa Winter, is the latest film that will renew your faith in the format. Joseph Winter himself stars as Shawn, a disgraced and demonetised YouTuber who attempts to relaunch his career by staging a livestream in an infamously haunted house. It’s the rare horror-comedy that gets the tonal balance exactly right, managing to be both genuinely frightening and laugh-out-loud funny (often all at the same time), and has some important things to say about fame-hungry internet celebrities who will do or say anything for views, affirmation and cold hard cash. Most importantly, though, it’s just an extremely good time; playing like a mash up of The Evil Dead (1981), The Blair Witch Project (1999) and Host (2020), it’s a perfect midnight movie and by far the best ‘livestream’ horror film yet.

Deadstream screens at FrightFest on Saturday 27 August

Glorious (2022) ****

When we meet Wes (Ryan Kwanten), the protagonist of Rebekah McKendry’s horror-comedy Glorious, he is having a bad day. Grieving for a relationship, he pulls into a roadside rest stop in an emotional state, drinks himself into a stupor and passes out in a grassy picnic area. But the day after is even worse: having woken up hideously hungover, he stumbles into the rest stop’s squalid bathroom and is met by the disembodied voice of none other than J. K. Simmons, who begins speaking to him from the next stall. The second character in this weird chamber piece soon reveals himself to be an all-powerful being called Ghat, who needs Wes to make a sacrifice to save the universe. What follows is a twisting tale of ancient world-eating gods, but one that is decidedly different from the vast majority of Lovecraftian films. While it is told through the established tropes of cosmic horror, at heart this is an intimate story about one man’s reckoning with himself. And if that (in addition to the fact that it is set almost entirely within a public toilet) is not enough to intrigue any discerning genre fan, it also happens to be utterly hilarious.

Glorious will be released on Shudder on 18 August

Hypochondriac (2022) ****

Any fan of contemporary genre cinema will know that there are now a lot of independent horror films about personal trauma, many of them unrelentingly bleak. Luckily, Addison Heimann’s Hypochondriac stands out from the crowd. The film’s protagonist, Will (Zach Villa), has never dealt with childhood trauma stemming from the day his schizophrenic mother tried to kill him. Now he’s starting to experience some strange symptoms himself, but his doctors keep telling him that they can find nothing wrong. It’s a genuinely frightening depiction of mental illness (one ‘based on a real breakdown’) that establishes an interesting intertextual relationship with another movie that explores similar themes; Will’s psychotic episodes openly borrow shots and transitions from Donnie Darko (2001) and feature a humanoid figure in a wolf suit obviously designed to recall Frank, the earlier film’s nightmarish rabbit. What is refreshing in the age of Ari Aster, though, is that there is light to be found in Hypochondriac’s darkness – a sense of hope that is so often missing from films concerned with grief, trauma and the horrors of the mind.

Hypochondriac will screen at FrightFest on Saturday 27 August

Speak No Evil (2022) ***

Critics and audiences have been raving about Christian Tafdrup’s Speak No Evil since it premiered at Sundance earlier this year, and it’s certainly a film worth seeking out (if not one for the faint of heart). This twisty horror-thriller follows Bjørn (Morten Burian) and Louise (Sidsel Siem Koch), a polite Danish couple who meet Dutch husband and wife Patrick (Fedja van Huêt) and Karin (Karina Smulders) while on holiday in Tuscany. When they return home, they receive a postcard inviting them to spend some quality time in the Netherlands with their new acquaintances. However, their pleasant weekend break quickly turns into a horror show of discomfort and anxiety as Patrick and Karin begin to display inappropriate and downright threatening behaviour. What begins as an amusing comedy of manners gradually becomes a taut, unpredictable thriller before finally transitioning into a nihilistic, deeply unpleasant and extraordinarily mean-spirited horror film – one that is admirable in its determination to pull no punches, but leaves something of a bad taste in the mouth.

Speak No Evil will be released on Shudder on 15 September

Swallowed (2022) ***

Carter Smith’s Swallowed follows Ben (Cooper Koch), who is saying his goodbyes before leaving a sleepy town between Maine and Canada to become a gay porn star. Before he can set out for Hollywood, though, his friend Dom (Jose Colon) wants to help him make some cash. Dom’s plan is to run drugs over the border, but these are no ordinary narcotics – and soon both Dom and Ben have ingested something that might just be alive. Swallowed has been sold as a queer take on body-horror, but is actually a little light on the kind of gross-out sequences associated with the sub-genre. It certainly has its wince-worthy moments, though, and its few practical effects (designed by the ever-reliable Dan Martin) are excellent. The film is also somewhat thematically confused in its approach to sex work; given some of its narrative events, it’s difficult to tell whether or not it endorses Ben’s decision to pursue a career in the adult entertainment industry. Either way, there’s plenty to enjoy here. It’s particularly strong in its tense opening act, as Ben and Dom spiral deeper and deeper into a bad situation that keeps getting worse.

Swallowed will screen at FrightFest on Sunday 28 August

Stella Donnelly Releases New Song ‘How Was Your Day?’

Stella Donnelly has unveiled a new song called ‘How Was Your Day?’. It’s the latest offering from her upcoming album Flood, following previous entries ‘Lungs’ and the title track. Listen to it below.

“This is my attempt at building a song out of a very specific dynamic between two monogamously involved people,” Donnelly said of ‘How Was Your Day?’ in a statement. “The verses are just excerpts from real conversations, fragments of what two people talk about when they both know they need to have a real talk but neither wants to be the one to bring it up. This song came out of lockdown and seeing a lot of friends break up or get married.

The new single comes paired with a video directed by Nick Mckk and Claire Giuffre. “This video does a really good job of portraying how annoying I am!” Donnelly added. “We shot it from opposite sides of the world which was a little bit stressful but a lot of fun.”

Flood is due out August 26 via Secretly Canadian.

Panda Bear and Sonic Boom Share Video for New Single ‘Edge of the Edge’

Panda Bear and Sonic Boom have unveiled ‘Edge of the Edge’, the second preview of their upcoming collaborative album Reset. ‘Edge of the Edge’ features a sample of Randy & the Rainbows’ 1963 doo-wop hit ‘Denise’ and arrives with a video by Danny Perez. Check it out below.

Reset is slated for release on August 12 via Domino. It was led by the single ‘Go On’, which made our Best New Songs list.

Breanna Barbara Announces New Album ‘Nothin’ But Time’, Unveils Video for New Single

Breanna Barbara has announced her second album: Nothin’ But Time will be released on November 11 via Fuzz Club. Today, the NYC-based singer-songwriter has shared its first single, ‘Diamond Time’, alongside an accompanying video. Check it out below, and scroll down for the LP’s cover art and tracklist.

“Diamond Light is a song about memory and how it can change through your perception of time,” Barbara explained in a press release. “Someone once said that life is like riding on a train backwards, you’re moving forward but you can only see where you’ve been. I have these memories from when I was a little girl and the older I get the more I start to see them in different ways. I equate Diamond Light to those shimmering moments that stick out in your brain and continue to move through time with different facets and faces, sort of like a diamond.”

Of the video, she added:

The video idea came after meeting up with my friend/director Kevin Jacobsen when I told him what the song was about and some memories I had when I was a little girl and how differently I see them now. He came up with this touching storyline that I found sad but also really beautiful. It was shot on March 15, 2020, the day our world changed and coincidentally on my birthday (also the Ides of March for those who are counting, there’s some serious juju on this day.) I will never forget that day just because it was like something out of a movie while simultaneously trying to create one. We had people cancelling left and right because of the news but everyone that did show up was dedicated to making it happen. I cherish this video for so many reasons but mostly because it is a keepsake for the world before. Creating art has never been easy but I’m so grateful we got to make it that day when everything was turning on its head, even just to dance a little.

Barbara recorded the new album with Andrija Tokic, who worked on her 2016 debut Mirage Dreams. It features contributions from Jack Lawrence (The Dead Weather), Tall Juan, Derry DeBorja (Jason Isbell), and Champagne Superchillin’s Ben Trimble and Charles Garmendia. “I wanted to make a record that reflected what was going on in the world and outside of myself, while exploring my sound more,” Barbara commented.

Nothin’ But Time Cover Artwork:

Nothin’ But Time Tracklist:

1. Diamond Light
2. Landslide
3. Nothin’ But Time
4. Rise
5. Me Too
6. Weight of the World
7. You Got Me High
8. Exist
9. Old Soul
10. Devil
11. Weaning

Spielbergs Release New Single ‘The New Year’s Resolution’

Spielbergs have shared a new song, ‘The New Year’s Resolution’, the opening track to their forthcoming record Vestli – out August 19 via Big Scary Monsters. It follows the previously released singles ‘When They Come For Me’, ‘Get Lost’, and ‘Every Living Creature’. Check it out below.

Singer/guitarist Mads Baklien said of the song in a statement. “When do you lose control of something? The New Year’s Resolution is about the place where you wonder if you just take one more step, there will be no turning back. You will lose everything and everyone you ever cared for. And then you take that step anyway. And you’re OK, you didn’t screw up everything after all. So you take another.”

Young Jesus Share New Song ‘Ocean’ Featuring Tomberlin, Announce New Album

Young Jesus – the Los Angeles-based project led by John Rossiter – have announced a new album called Shepherd Head. The follow-up to 2020’s Welcome to Conceptual Beach lands on September 16 via Saddle Creek.  Today’s announcement comes with the release of the new single ‘Ocean’, which features vocals from Sarah Beth Tomberlin. Check it out and find the album’s cover art and tracklist below.

For the new LP, Rossiter experimented with using found sounds and voice memoes to piece together songs. “I would pitch things down an octave and add strange reverb,” he explained in a statement. “If a dog barked, I would isolate it and make it part of a beat. I recorded a voice singing on the street just walking by a storefront and autotuned it. Some guitar parts are just mistakes from voice memos that I chopped, stitched, and looped. I used sounds of rivers, people walking, friends talking. It was a lot of fun. I didn’t care about the fidelity of the recording. Whatever wanted to be in came in.”

Shepherd Head Cover Artwork:

Shepherd Head Tracklist:

1. Rose Eater
2. Ocean [feat. Tomberlin]
3. Johno
4. Shepherd Head
5. Gold Line Awe
6. Satsuma
7. Believer [feat. Arswain]
8. A Lake

Beyoncé Removes ‘Milkshake’ Interpolation From ‘Energy’ After Kelis Called It Theft

Beyoncé has reportedly removed the sample of ‘Milkshake’ from ‘Energy’, a song that appears on her just-released album RENAISSANCE, on some streaming services. Upon the album’s release, Kelis said she did not grant permission for her music to be used on the album and that she heard about it the “same way everyone else did.”

She also called the use of the song “theft,” adding: “My mind is blown too because the level of disrespect and utter ignorance of all 3 parties involved is astounding. Nothing is ever as it seems, some of the people in this business have no soul or integrity, and they have everyone fooled.”

Kelis’ former producers Pharrell Williams and Chad Hugo are credited as composers on ‘Energy’. “Chad really is like an amoeba, he’s spineless,” Kelis later said in a video. “It’s a miracle he can keep his neck up, but Pharrell knows better. This is a direct hit at me, he does this stuff all the time. It’s very petty — very, very, very — and the reality is that it’s frustrating.” Kelis, who worked with Williams and Hugo on her first two albums, previously claimed they “blatantly lied and tricked” her over writing credits.

This isn’t the only change RENAISSANCE has gone through since its release on July 29. Beyoncé also updated a line in ‘Heater’ after facing criticism over lyrics that are considered ableist. “The word, not used intentionally in a harmful way, will be replaced,” a representative for Beyoncé said.

In light of the backlash, Monica Lewinsky tweeted, “uhmm, while we’re at it… #Partition,” calling out the 2013 that includes the lyrics: “He popped all my buttons, and he ripped my blouse/ He Monica Lewinsky-ed all on my gown.” When asked by a Twitter user if she had reached out to Beyoncé’s team “before you saw all the heat,” Lewinsky replied, “No, I haven’t. I did mention it in the first vanity fair article I wrote in 2014… which was the first public thing I’d done in 10 years. but you make an interesting/fair point…”

Fantasia 2022 Review: What to Do With the Dead Kaiju? (2022)

What to Do With the Dead Kaiju? asks, well, what do you do with a dead giant monster? It’s a novel premise, but one that’s squandered as the film unfolds. Despite a solid opening ten minutes which suggest a thoughtful exploration of life after a major crisis, the film loses itself to clumsy comedy and contrived endings.  

A giant monster lies dead, apparently killed by a mysterious white light, its mammoth corpse now a problem for the Japanese government. Ministers squabble over whose department should handle the dead beast while the JSF (Japan Special Forces) is called in to assist. Among the JSF is Arata (Ryosuke Yamada), who has a troubled romantic past with Yukino (Tao Tsuchiya), secretary to the Environment Minister. Arata once disappeared for two years, leaving Yukino heartbroken, but the mystery of his absence may in fact herald a solution to the monster crisis.  

The premise here is great. When the credits roll on a giant monster film, after the monster has been dealt with, what happens next? Who cleans up the mess? How do people adapt? Does society go back to business-as-usual? Can it? It’s a shame that these questions ultimately go unanswered. 

Nevertheless, let me praise those first good ten minutes. The monster immediately evokes several real-life disasters. Talk of an “exclusion zone” around its carcass recalls several nuclear tragedies; the imagery of soldiers returning home deliberately frames the monster as if it were a conventional war; various voices also ask when life will return to normal, bringing up familiar reactions to covid-19 lockdowns. 

At the same time, we have the Prime Minister (Toshiyuki Nishida) eagerly awaiting the day when he can announce the crisis is over. Half-truths and lies are given so he can declare the all-clear, framed by myriad backroom deals to further careers at the expense of public safety. All of this provides terrific ground on which to explore what happens after a major crisis– and is therefore timely as ever.  

But then the film doesn’t follow through. What we think will be a film about the aftermath of a giant monster attack is betrayed by its eventual plot. As the film develops, the monster’s corpse throws up new problems from mysterious mould to noxious gas. The movie becomes a series of crises caused by the monster’s body which the JSF must solve, with government ministers scheming away in the background.  In that sense, the monster may as well be alive – it’s still the number one threat in the film. And we’ve seen that elsewhere many times before; this was a chance to explore something new and unique. What do people do in the aftermath? We never find out because the monster is still the focus. 

It makes the film’s scope a lot smaller. We never get to see what the wider impacts of the monster’s existence are, or how its rampage has affected society. Maybe this is me getting hung on what I wanted the film to be versus what it actually is, but what it actually is isn’t all that interesting, either. After we’ve been introduced to the scheming, backstabbing ways of careerist politicians, the film doesn’t do anything more with that setup. It’s another good idea that the movie doesn’t quite know what to do with.  

The movie also peppers unfunny comedy throughout, and a great deal of it is toilet humour. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll laugh at the bean scene in Blazing Saddles (1974) just like the next guy, but the delivery of the toilet jokes in Dead Kaiju just falls flat. Most of the other jokes do, too. It feels as though the film isn’t confident in taking itself seriously and so undermines itself with daft humour. 

Of course, before I finish the review, I must mention the ending. Without spoiling it, it’s a real let-down. The film deliberately draws attention to how contrived it is, perhaps as a get-out-jail-free card to stave off criticism. But criticise it, I will. Almost nothing the film covers in its near two-hour runtime is resolved or reflected on with the “twist” conclusion. It’s the biggest deus ex machina of them all.  

 

 

 

 

Author Spotlight: Sarah Jackson, A Bit Much

0

It can be hard to date, but even harder when your best friend is in the hospital, your friend who is involved with annoying people asks you to go out with her, and a previous fling is on your mind. That’s what’s happening to Alice, a 24-year-old who just quit her job and spends her days visiting Mia in the hospital or working on her unfinished novel, just trying to get by.

The complexity of friendships is a major theme of A Bit Much, Sarah Jackson’s debut novel. Alice wants to be a good friend and visit Mia, but doing so reminds her of her freedom and Mia’s worsening state. Going out with Anne makes her feel bad, as Anne is prone to cruel comments disguised as honesty. And when she meets James, a new neighbor that might have some romantic potential, she isn’t sure when to think when Dylan, a previous crush, stays on her mind.

We caught up with Jackson to talk about messy lives, imperfect endings, and what inspired her new novel.

Congrats on your debut! How does it feel to have this product of work out in the world?

Thank you, first of all. It’s really exciting. It’s also really scary, but a lot of people have messaged me on Instagram — the Bookstagrammers — and honestly, those messages have meant so much. Obviously, it means a lot when people I know have told me they loved it, but I think there’s always a fear, like, ‘Do people need to know me personally to totally connect with everything I’m saying?’ So, those messages where people say they related to the book and they loved it have meant a lot to me. I read those several times. Focusing on those positive messages is what I’m trying to do.

Alice’s life feels like she’s constantly dodging security lasers, trying to find something to do that doesn’t make her feel awful. Why did you want to write about the downsides of life and a particularly rough period for this character?

I wanted to talk about that just because some of those darker experiences have been my own. But also, for me, darker or sad moments are written in a way where I can connect to them emotionally or it feels like it’s not just me who has experienced these things. Even if you don’t know the writer or you haven’t met someone in person where you can have this conversation with, you do feel not alone in a way. For a lot of people, I think they can’t talk about these things or they don’t feel comfortable or sure how they want to express it. It’s almost like you’re having a conversation with what you’re reading, sometimes. I wanted to write something honest from a certain perspective, and hope to make people feel less alone.

So while her best friend Mia is in the hospital, unable to do much, Alice is debating whether or not to live, date, and be free because she knows Mia can’t. What inspired this dynamic between them?

So when I was 17, I was diagnosed with cancer. I had just started university at the time, and had to leave. So I structured Mia’s treatment similar to mine, where I had to be in the hospital for many days at a time. I wrote Mia’s character fairly different from my own, because I didn’t want to write my exact experience — I wasn’t interested in writing a memoir. But I like to take experiences I’ve had or witnessed, and create on top of that. I’ve always been interested in friendships and the dynamics there, especially when it’s either a codependent friendship or uneven, where one person really relies on the other, who can be quite free. I haven’t experienced this dynamic personally, but I’ve seen so much of it and found it endlessly fascinating.

I’m sorry to hear that. I hope everything’s better — it’s good you were able to use that experience as a jumping-off point for a creative endeavor.

Yeah, some parts were harder to write than others, but I think there’s self-protection in fictionalizing it. I did want to make Mia pretty different than me, though I’ve experienced a lot of things she has and a lot of the feelings she’s experiencing while dealing with a serious illness. It was still a protection thing, to write from the perspective of Alice. I don’t know if ‘more fun’ is a good word for it, but I thought it would be interesting for me. I just don’t want to write exactly about myself, because it seems boring.

The party scenes were so spot on — there’s always obnoxious people like Anne, or the artist who calls himself “Ekphrasis.” Were they inspired by people you met or just by a worst-nightmare scenario you thought up?

I think the worst-nightmare scenario is more interesting to read, but there are definitely people who I have met who are like this. No character is exactly any of these people. But most of these characters are in their early 20s, and a lot of the times when I’ve met people, you’re just getting a part of them. You’re getting the part that they want to be perceived, and they’re acting out of insecurity or judgment, and you only see a part of these people. Sometimes Alice acknowledges that, and sometimes she doesn’t. She’s very insecure and judgemental herself, but I was mostly just joking around because they have irritated me. But there’s probably more to them, so it’s a light joking.

Alice’s constant struggle in wanting to write, trying to, and giving up, is something I can definitely relate to. Were you like that in your writing process?

Oh, yes. So, I wrote the first chapter of this in 2010. It’s not like I’ve been writing constantly since then. So I wrote the first chapter, and didn’t touch it for another year, then wrote quite a bit within two months. It’s just a losing confidence thing, really. I didn’t touch it for another three years after that, but it was always at the back of my mind and I wrote down little notes. I really was fighting a lot of self-doubt, and then there was another 5 years. So it’s been a real struggle with confidence and being, like, ‘I don’t know what I’m doing.’

I will say though, when I had that first draft which took me a while to get to, I cut more than half of what I wrote. Full characters. A lot of people in their early 20s can write an amazing novel; that was not me. I’m so happy the first draft is not what people are holding in their hands. I think I needed the time to look back and reflect and think about the characters in a different way, especially Alice and Mia. I think I was able to write a more layered relationship there. 

I’ve shared that story with other writers as well, who are like, ‘Oh, that makes me feel better.’ 

I wanted to talk a little bit about the ‘unlikeable narrator’ trend that’s going on right now — several of my favorite books like My Year of Rest and Relaxation, Hysteria, The New Me, A Certain Hunger, have narrators who don’t make the best decisions. What made you want to portray Alice in this way?

I always knew that a lot of people wouldn’t like Alice. I just really wanted to write something honest. For Alice, with her anxiety, depression, and really loud insecurities, she already thinks a lot of people won’t like her. Although Mia thinks Alice can be too much, Alice knows she loves her. Mia has notes for Alice, basically. That’s also why her relationship matters to Alice so much. Mia also sees things about Alice — Alice puts up these blocks, so people can’t get too close to her.

I wanted to show the darker or cruel thoughts that Alice has, because I just wanted it to be honest. She’s hiding these feelings and thoughts from a lot of people. I wanted to show what that can look like. Sometimes, even if it’s just intrusive thoughts that aren’t actually true, but you feel them in the moment, whether it’s about yourself or someone else, or whether you can work through them or they’re harder to get over. Some people have told me that some of the things Alice thinks or says are things they’d never want to admit that they have felt or thought or said. But they did feel that they could relate, in that moment. And not everyone will relate to Alice — if someone said that they didn’t like her, I’d get it. Like, I’m not gonna fight that. But it’s funny because people tell me they like Alice, and I’m like, ‘Oh, really?’ She’s not easy. She’s a challenging character.

Much of the book concerns complicated relationships, and I like how you didn’t shy away from the messiness. People are rarely perfect, and every character in this book does at least one thing you cringe at.

Thank you so much, yeah, I did want to write realistic characters. You said everyone does something you cringe at — for me, it was important to do that. With Mia — while I was going through my treatment, and even after, while watching things where I would see this sick character who is just an angel, the perfect sick person, really. They have maybe one breakdown, but for the most part, they’re brave and amazing. I think Mia is still there for Alice, and she is a strong person in ways, but she can also be irrational and cruel sometimes. I wanted to show all of those parts. The ‘model sick person’ thing can really upset me. It sends a weird message where it’s like these characters have to have all these amazing qualities for you to feel compassion for them. I didn’t want Mia to feel like that. Obviously, Alice’s flaws are way more front and center, but that was important for me as well.

Totally. She’d do some stuff that might be a little passive-aggressive towards Alice that I’d be mad at, then backtrack, like, ‘Oh, I forgot she’s sick. Can’t be upset at her.’ It was this odd dynamic.

Yeah, it’s funny you mention that, because Alice said something like that at one point, but of course you can be mad at her. But it’s weird because they’re both tiptoeing around each other. Mia is trying to take care of Alice in a way where she’s frustrated. She doesn’t know what’s gonna happen with her life. I like reading and watching messiness, I guess. And I know a lot of people won’t relate to what’s in the book, but I wasn’t necessarily trying to go towards the mass appeal, rather than go toward what felt honest and fun for me to write. ‘Fun’ is odd to say, I guess I mean interesting as a writer.

I liked the ending — it didn’t offer anything conclusive, but that’s consistent with the general tone and flux of the whole book. Why did you want to end it this way?

Well, thank you, I feel like it’s consistent with the book. But I had read a couple of Bookstagram or Goodreads reviews about not getting closure, which I think is so interesting. I don’t necessarily look for closure in films or books or anything like that. It’s more so feelings are what I’m hoping to connect to.

Spoiler alert for the ending!

I feel like with the death of somebody, even if you know if it’s gonna happen or have a heads up — in this case it wasn’t totally clear — it’s rare to feel closure. Especially so soon. The book is set during the span of just a few months. I didn’t want to do the ‘Month later…’ where she’s fine. I wanted to keep it within the frame that I had built. Mia’s death eclipses everything for Alice. Some people would have loved resolution with James and Dylan, for example. But in this moment, her life has just blown up. This person who means everything to her is gone, and that’s all she’s thinking about. Which was how it was from the start of the book. To me, it was a natural place to end — it’s the worst thing she could imagine. What a great pulling for a book!

I also feel like Alice wouldn’t do anything different. It made total sense with her character to just stop.

Yes, thank you! That’s very smart. Can you also say that I said that? Just kidding, but that’s true. The last paragraph, I had to figure out how to word it. The same thing was gonna happen, but I had to stick to Alice’s voice and say it how I thought she would say it. She will say something and you don’t know if she’s actually gonna do it. I agree with you — she wouldn’t even have a plan. She’s just feeling things, without trying to feel them. It’s really hard to prepare emotionally to lose somebody, of course. And it wasn’t clear to her or the reader what was going to happen. Some people have said it felt abrupt, but, you know, that’s death. I could have made it so she picks one of the guys in the end, but I’m just not interested in that type of ending. When a person you really love is gone, that’s all you think about, and it does explode your world.


A Bit Much is available now.