Home Blog Page 2

Bonny Doon Announce New Album ‘Forever Green’, Share New Single ‘Lucky Ones’

Detroit quartet Bonny Doon have announced a new album called Forever Green. The follow-up to 2023’s Let There Be Music comes out February 5 on ANTI-. It’s led by ‘Lucky Ones’, an embittered yet extremely pleasant heartland rock tune. Check it out and find the album cover and tracklist below.

“Most people scrape by and can barely afford to live despite working their ass off,” vocalist Bill Lennox reflected in a statement. “Meanwhile the rich get richer and those in power are doing everything they can to suppress the rights and dignity of working-class people. It’s kind of a culmination of grievance and frustration both personal and collective. In my case, 12 years into a band, 12 years older, still bartending until 3am, the body doesn’t recover like it used to. You can sometimes feel like your dues have been paid, and you’re waiting on something to get easier or fall into place. I know a lot of people that feel like that.”

Forever Green Cover Artwork:

Forever Green

Forever Green Tracklist:

1. Cry With Me
2. Sliding Glass Door
3. Lucky Ones
4. So Close to the Edge
5. Clock Keeps Ticking
6. Right in the Eye
7. All of My
8. Forever Green
9. End of the Line
10. Long Have You Wandered

Artist Spotlight: Katie Gregson-MacLeod

Katie Gregson-MacLeod is a Scottish singer-songwriter who was born in the small city of Inverness. Her mother, a pianist, taught the school choir, while her father was an English teacher, instilling in her an appreciation for music and literature from an early age. While studying history at Edinburgh University, she released her debut EP, Games I Play. It was between that indie pop-leaning project and 2023’s Songs Written for Piano EP that the viral success of ‘complex (demo)’ led to a deal with Columbia Records. Having moved to London, she put out another EP, Big Red, on Sony in 2023 before splitting with the label and signing with Matt Maltese’s Last Recordings on Earth. Her next EP, last year’s Love Me Too Well, I’ll Retire Early, was a stepping stone for her just-released debut album, Albatross, which takes its name from Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s poem ‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’, where the phrase “an albatross around your neck” originates. Tracked live over two weeks in Frome with producer Dom Monks and co-producer Will Taylor, it’s not just an album about being disillusioned by the major label industry but embracing all her best songwriting instincts: disarming intimacy, playfulness, a keen eye for power dynamics at every level. As she realizes on the heart-wrenching closer ‘Daughter’, “I can do whatever I want to.”

We caught up with Katie Gregson-MacLeod for this edition of our Artist Spotlight interview series to talk about the beginnings of her songwriting journey, recording Albatross, writing on piano, and more.


I saw you quote the Lucy Dacus lyric, “In five years, I hope the songs feel like covers,” in a broader context, but I wonder if it rings true for you in a kind of literal way when you think back on the beginnings of your songwriting journey.

It’s a great lyric for many reasons, on many levels, but literally, it does feel like that sometimes. I’m sometimes struck by the resonance of a random older song. I think sometimes I’ll be playing it live, and I’ll really feel a song that I wrote when I was 18, 19, or 20, and I’ll be really surprised by that. Obviously, like all songwriting, even if it’s your own, what it means to you and how it can be applied to your life changes all the time. In general, I can sometimes feel a bit of distance or separation between me and some of the older stuff. I think songs like ‘Complex’ feel quite distant emotionally sometimes, because I didn’t have a very long emotional life with them before they were belonging to other people.

Often, the times that I feel songs being most precious to me are the times between writing and making it, when no one else has really heard it, but I like to play it now and again in my house, or maybe I’ve shown a couple of my friends, and it feels very much mine. Whereas some songs, like ‘Complex’, didn’t have that long life of that emotional period. Sometimes I can find that at gigs, for different reasons, I get that emotional connection to it – whether that’s seeing people singing along, them being emotional, or having it come on a day where you feel a certain way that relates to the song. It’s interesting, the life that songs live within you. I’m so excited to feel that out with the album and what songs are going to be important to me emotionally in five years.

There’s already some distance between finishing these new songs and putting them out, but it must be hard to imagine them feeling, in five years, the same way you feel now towards Games I Play. 

I think a big part of making this record in the way that I made it – which was very live, over a short time period, with players in a room captured in a very condensed vacuum – comes down to Dom Monks, the producer. This is his ethos as well: capturing exactly where I am at that exact point, and having it only need to reflect me then, in those two weeks. I was a little bit nervous and insecure going into recording, and Dom said to me, “The best album that we can make is the one that reflects you right now the best.” Because I was thinking, “What if I’m not good enough at this?” As it went on, I realized that’s the whole point – the perceived imperfections, or the shortfalls, that’s exactly as it was when it was recorded, and therefore it’s what it is.

I feel like that gives me a timeless relationship to the album. I didn’t even sing that song the same way ever again. The way that it was recorded was one of the takes, and that take has never been repeated. I never sing the same way twice; I never play the exact same thing twice. It was captured in the moment, and therefore, it’s so of a time that it’s kind of timeless for me in my life. Now, looking back, I listen to some of the recordings and I’m like, “Wow, I make mistakes this whole time,” but it’s part of the charm for me. 

I’m interested in that in the making of the album as a continuation of how you recorded the Love Me Too Well, I’ll Retire Early EP that came out last year, in the sense that it was also live, off the cuff, and spontaneous. In collaboration with Dom Monks and Will Taylor, did you maintain that same approach for the most part?

I think the EP felt like a stepping stone to the more extreme version of it, which is the album. With the EP, I just wanted to make music again. It’d been a while since I’d recorded or collaborated with players, and I really wanted to have that experience. It’s kind of rare for me in my life to just be in a room playing with other people and recording it. I really found that EP experience magical. There was a bit more overdubbing than there was on the album, and we did a little bit of work back in the studio in London, but for the most part, it was four days in the North Highlands. It was captured, and it made me realize how much I needed to do that for the record as well. 

I think I can kind of credit Will with that in a sense, because I spoke to him in such depth about his experience of making his last record, which was the self-titled Flyte album he’d just put out around that time. That’s how I came to work with Dom as well, chatting to Will about wanting to go away and come back feeling like it has that kind of organic approach. I kind of hate the word organic, but it is, unfortunately.The way that Dom works always fascinated me, and obviously his output is amazing, the records always sound amazing, and if it’s good enough for Adrianne Lenker, it’s good enough for me.  [laughs] It landed in a style of recording where, essentially, we had barely any pre-production, no rehearsals. We recorded vocals and instruments all together. That was such an amazing experience – terrifying as a singer-songwriter, but also so special and exactly what the record needed.

There are also distinct contrasts between some of the songs – how you approach something like ‘How Were You to Know’, which is one of the most stripped-back and raw tracks on the album, and then ‘Roadkill’, which has some lovely embellishments. 

I think a lot of the time, luckily, those questions answer themselves, and you feel what a song needs either when you write it, or when you talk about it and play it. Some songs take more thinking about. I think ‘Roadkill’ and a song called ‘Second Hand’, which is the second one on the B-side, were the hardest to get right, because the rest of them just kind of happened naturally. A song called ‘Same Eyes’ on the B-side as well, that one also was weirdly a question mark for a while about what it needed. There is a real preservation of songs’ natural form, I suppose, when it comes to Dom and his style of recording, because it is recorded the way it is. That initial performance of vocal and guitar, or vocal and piano, is such a core of the piece. We weren’t building things for me to then lay a vocal on top. It was a real kind of trusting everyone’s instincts situation. With ‘Roadkill’, we were like, “What’s going to unlock it?” I think the different guitar parts that we landed on did that, but that was later on in the process – that took a while.

The opening track, ‘196’, with the image you evoke of playing music with people, is an interesting starting point for the record. You’re going back to a specific time in your life where music had a certain kind of preciousness. How intentional was that placement?

It’s one of those things that, retrospectively, when I look at it, makes so much sense to me. Obviously, it’s a song reminiscing about a time when I felt really connected to music, really connected to a place and a time, and felt like I understood so much more, or that things were simpler – and at the time of writing it, feeling like I’d lost touch with that a bit. It’s funny, because I wasn’t going to put that song on the record at all. I loved it, and when I wrote it, I was proud of it, but it was actually in a kind of discard pile that I’d sent Dom of songs that were not really necessarily my top 10. He instantly was like, “Well, that should go on the record, come on.” And I was like, “Oh, interesting that you think that.” It speaks to his instant understanding of the record – we didn’t have a sit-down discussion, me and Dom, about exactly what this record means and what every song means to me, but at every turn, I realized more and more how much he understood what the album was all about.

This, I guess, was my first sign. Putting ‘196’ – especially putting it first, which was his idea – makes so much sense, because this album was, for me, a return to that feeling of collaborating in a room with people. It makes so much sense that for a record about wanting something to unlock your contentment or your peace, or wanting something back. Everybody looks to the past to give them their answers, or looks to the past and imagines that they had it so much better, or that they understood so much more. Putting that song first, I wasn’t sure about it for a while, and now I’m like, “Oh, well, of course.” That just speaks to the people I was working with being so in tune.

On ‘The Big Lie’, you also reference the Market Bar in Inverness, where I read that you still play at open mics. I’d love for you to talk about your history with that pub, and what the community there means to you now. 

So, the pub I used to play in was the Captain’s Bar. That’s the one I used to play in a lot, and I will still go back. Whenever I’m in Edinburgh, I go back and I play a song or two there. The community – some of the people I knew back then are still there; they’re still playing there every day, most days. Some people that I played with aren’t there anymore. But I still feel this kind of return home in a way, even if no one in that room knows that’s my experience, or maybe they don’t know who I am, or they never met me. I definitely sit there and I have that moment to myself of reflection.

The Market Bar – I go there on a night out in Inverness. I was there a few days ago, actually. [laughs] It’s this amazing, slightly grungy, quirky music pub. It’s got an old man pub downstairs, and then an upstairs where the live music happens. Great place. That is referenced in ‘The Big Lie’, because on the walls they hang photos of essentially dead iconic musicians. So that’s why I used that in that song. It was a big thing for me as well since I’ve moved to London and been full-time in the music industry – I was always coming back and returning to Captain’s Bar and the Royal Oak and these places where I felt such a connection to music, kind of like ‘196’ talks about. Those are the places where I felt the most in tune and connected to music, so I guess it was my way of feeling it again, even when I wasn’t in some chapters of my life.

When you were writing these songs in this chapter of your life, did they mean something different to you than when you were in London going back and forth more? 

I think when I wrote ‘The Big Lie’ and ‘196’, they weren’t far off each other – maybe half a year or something. I was definitely in a time when my connection to music and what it meant to be someone making and releasing music, my relation to that career, was definitely pulled into question. I was struggling – I felt like, as much as I’d been so lucky to fall into the career that I have now, I also felt like I’d made some sacrifices. Maybe in the process of getting to have these amazing opportunities, my connection to the core artistic form had changed. I don’t know if that’s true – I wrote this album, I wrote so much music in that time period – but it was how I felt about what was happening around me and my career progression. As you say, returning home to these places or thinking about them felt more weighted in this time period. They felt symbolic, in a way, because they were places where I understood myself and my music more than I understood it at that time.

In terms of the campaign, you introduced the record with ‘Nothing Really Changes’, which is this bird’s-eye view of your journey in a neat, emotional way. But listening to the record, ‘The Big Lie’ is an interesting follow-up, because it digs into a lot of things around the major label business while being unsparing in the details. Do you remember feeling a different sort of apprehensiveness with it?

When I wrote ‘The Big Lie’, it was about a year and a half before I made the album, and it was at a time when I just felt very disillusioned. All these questions around my own career and my own ambition were swirling around my head. Since I’ve started writing music, I’ve really not been good at considering who might hear or receive these things I’m writing. [laughs] I’ve been a very selfish songwriter – I’ve just always written songs and said things in the way that I wanted to say them at the time I wrote them. Although sometimes I can become more nervous about things a long time after writing them, it’s why it’s such an emotionally important process for me, and it’s why my style is the way it is, I suppose. 

There was no apprehension in writing ‘The Big Lie’, but I definitely felt some catharsis in it. ‘Nothing Really Changes’ is, as you say, this very retrospective, zoomed-out version of my life. It was really cathartic to write, and it felt like a real acceptance and reflection of the last four or five years. Those two had distinct roles in my life. ‘The Big Lie’, it’s not even specifically about people I know or companies I’ve been involved with, it’s really broad. Especially with the chorus, when I say, “Tell me the last time you and I were on the same side,” that is, for me, about so much more than the music industry. That is how I feel about lots of things to do with capitalism and politics. 

I’m also thinking of it in the context of Love Me Too Well, I’ll Retire Early, in the sense of, maybe some weightier subjects were withheld because you were thinking about a debut record at the time, but that wasn’t what materialized first. Was there a palpable shift in your mindset when you actively went into making Albatross?

Yeah, I think as I’ve been writing since the beginning of my adult writing journey, I’ve always held songs back, thinking, “That’s the album.” So I’ve never really had a moment of, “Okay, now I’m gonna start writing for the album.” I always had my sights set on the debut. And even though the shape changed so much, I knew the kind of themes and weight that I wanted the songs and the album to take. Even six or seven years ago – and none of those songs are on the record now – I remember I would make track lists and think about the debut as a separate thing from the EPs, which were little timestamps. I quite liked doing the EPs in that way, where they’d be set in a specific time or set in one story. I liked doing it that way because I felt it was a separate thing in my mind from the album.

For instance, the oldest song on the record is now ‘Same Eyes’, which was 2023. I wrote all of Big Red and Love Me Too Well after that song, or around the same time. It wasn’t as much that I suddenly changed gear – I knew that the songs that meant the most to me and had the most weight were for the album. That’s probably why you have that variation of tone, sonic identity, and themes on the record. I feel the through lines and the threads, but I’m also bringing a lot of different chapters of my life into it. You can tell there are different versions of me or different perspectives, but I still feel it as one voice. I’ve kind of been forever writing this one.

‘Chicago’ stands out because it’s one song where you’re writing from a perspective other than your own. What was that a lyrical experiment like? 

It’s so much fun. It’s something that I don’t do enough, and I really want to do more of it, because there is a sense of freedom and play that you can get. I think you can hear that in the verses of that song. The whole song is quite a funny song to me – the chorus itself is kind of hilarious, the verses are quite wordy and playful, and I think that’s the kind of element that can come out when you’re writing separate from yourself. When it’s in your personal life, if you have a feeling, you really want to say it in the exact right way. I think I’ll always be a heavily autobiographical writer, just because of the role that songwriting plays in my emotional processing and my life. It’s a journal, essentially, so that’s always going to be really important to me. But as I evolve as a writer, and as time goes on, it would be a shame not to have the challenge and the play of writing from other people’s stories as well.

Given the role they play in your emotional processing, were there songs about a specific subject you knew you wanted to write before they were actually written?

For sure, yeah. I think ‘Same Eyes’ is probably my best example of that – it’s a song about my mom. I’ve always been terrible at writing about family. I want to be able to mythologize and encapsulate my amazing family, but sometimes when something feels so vast and far-reaching in your life, it’s hard to put it into words. When I eventually wrote ‘Same Eyes’, I was so happy to have expressed it in that way, and it just kind of poured out. It was in a writing session with three other writers, actually. We started chatting about it all and what I wanted to write about. Everyone was getting quite emotional, because everyone was talking about their mothers, and it was all quite lovely – and then I just couldn’t get anything out. I couldn’t think of what I wanted to say. They said, “Okay, we’re gonna go for a coffee. We’ll be back in half an hour.” They came back, and I’d written all the lyrics. I’d written what became the song; what we ironed out after that was some chord shifts and stuff like that.

Having those conversations really helped me beforehand, and then they gave me that room – I think they just knew it was gonna come out, so they left me to it. It was years of wanting to write a song like that, and then 20 minutes of writing, which is sometimes how it happens. When that was written, I thought, “That needs to be an album song,” because it had such a weight to it due to the subject. I guess I have lyrical ideas or song ideas that I know, even if it doesn’t happen on that day, one day I’m gonna write a song based around them, and it’ll be so cathartic when it happens. I really felt that with ‘How Were You to Know’ – it’s a very lyrically dense song, but it expressed a lot of what I wanted to say about the subject. I would say ‘Daughter’ as well hit upon some things and said them in a way that I had probably been vying to say for a long time.

How did that one happen in comparison to ‘Same Eyes’?

‘Daughter’ was also in a writing session, though it was less of a traditional session style – I went for a cup of tea at my friend Elanor Moss’s house. Do you know Elanor?

Oh, yeah. I’ve interviewed her.

So I went to Ellie’s, and we always have great big deep chats. At that time, we spoke a lot about where I was in my head and in my career; I was in a bit of a turning point, a period of questioning. It was relatively quick as well. We spoke about records that we love – we’re both fans of very classic songwriting and lovers of folk music of the ’50s, ’60s, and ’70s. Our favorites are always going to be very classic writers, and we’re both big fans of Sibylle Baier, Molly Drake, and Bridget St. John. We had probably listened to or thought about those artists a lot on that day, and then we started writing and found this melody that felt quite classic. She’s incredibly clever and lyrically inspired, and it was really fun to write lyrics with her. Usually, with lyrics, I’m like, “That’s my business,” but Ellie has such great literary references, and she understood where I was coming from so much because we’d had such great chats about it. 

We had this really beautiful afternoon of writing, and we found that refrain, “I can do whatever I want to.” Which is the album – that line itself the whole thing, I suppose. And the sadness of that line – we loved the way it felt when we came up with, “Sometimes the things you want, you get/ I can do whatever I want to.” Those moments where you say something so plainly, yet in the context of the song and in the context of your own life, they hold such a weight. That’s what that song was – it was just very simply put, but it said things in a way that I hadn’t really said them before, and that’s kind of why it’s the last song on the record as well. I don’t think I expected that to come out of that day. It was just a very beautiful moment.

I’ve been listening to a lot of folk records in the vein of Sibylle Baier and Bridget St. John, and something I’ve realized is whenever I hear a piano ballad on a folk record that’s mostly acoustic guitar, my attention is immediately piqued. That’s what I felt listening to the two piano songs on the record, ‘Daughter’ being one of them. Do you find yourself entering a different headspace when presenting a song in that way?

Piano was my first companion in songwriting. I’m not a great pianist – I don’t really know what I’m doing on the piano, never learned, and would love to learn more to help me out. I sometimes find myself getting frustrated with instruments, where I go, “I know that I have a really good idea, but I just don’t really know what’s going on.” Sometimes with the piano, like with those two songs – especially with ‘Kissing’, because it was such a personal, isolated experience – it just hits on an emotion and is the perfect companion for an emotion in a way that I’ve never experienced with other things. Being my first instrument and the thing that I wrote on when I was growing up, I do just have this special relationship with it. The satisfaction of nailing a piano song that’s perfect, that says what I want to say perfectly – that is an amazing feeling. Emotionally, the place that I can switch into when I hit that groove with it is really exciting, and those are some of the most fulfilling moments of my songwriting life.

Like, ‘I Don’t Think of Kissing You’ – when that idea formed, and then I just worked away at it for a couple of evenings at my parents’ house, it was like a puzzle to put together because I wanted it to feel like my favorite classic jazz standards. I liked the idea that they often have a mixture of a harmonic and a lyrical return – maybe they’ll go elsewhere for a bit melodically, but they’ll always return to this central line or harmonic movement. It was really hard to write, in a way, because I knew I wanted to have these satisfying turns and then go, “I don’t think of kissing you.” When I found that song, worked on it, and achieved what I wanted to achieve, it was the most euphoric experience, in a way that’s specifically my experience on piano. I still sometimes have periods of time where I’m really drawn to it, and other times when I’m more drawn to the guitar. 

I’m kind of with you there, where I love classic guitar folk, but sometimes when you hear that piano, you just can’t help it. I was listening to Molly Drake, ‘I Remember’ – that’s a piano song, isn’t it? That one I just think is perfect. And also, this is kind of random, but ‘And So It Goes’ by Billy Joel. I would call that a perfect piano song as well. When I hear perfect piano songs, I do just think you just can’t come close – there’s something so pure. 

Did you know you were going to title the record Albatross when you wrote that line in ‘Daughter’?

I didn’t know at the time. I didn’t know for ages. I felt like it was maybe more literary than I usually go, and I was like, “Does it sound like I’m trying to be too clever, or trying to allude to something that feels quite separate?” The more time that went on, the more I realized that that line in that poem and the symbolism really just make sense and represent the record so well. I’m going to credit Elanor Moss with that as well – she told me about the poem and referenced it as we wrote ‘Daughter’. We sat having dinner in Frome in the middle of the album recording process, and I was going over some ideas for album titles, and she said, “Well, there’s Albatross.” I didn’t know for ages, but I just kept coming back to it, realizing that it was the strongest representation of what I wanted to say. The album encompasses different chapters and themes in my life, and they all feed into that albatross symbolism.


This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity and length.

Katie Gregson-MacLeod’s Albatross is out now via Last Recordings on Earth.

Black Doves Season 3: Cast, Rumours & Release Date

0

Netflix spy thriller Black Doves is back with season 2, and it’s just as sleek and fun as you remember. Thanks to the appealing cast and intriguing storylines, boredom will be the last thing on viewers’ minds when they tune in.

With 3.8 million views this week, the series is currently among the most-watched on Netflix, as well as a Top 10 show in 50 countries. Could this mean that another installment is on the way? Here’s what we know so far.

Black Doves Season 3 Release Date

At the time of writing, Netflix hasn’t officially renewed Black Doves for more episodes. Given that the show recently premiered its sophomore season, there’s still time.

The streaming service often waits a beat to assess viewership before making a decision either way. For now, the behind-the-scenes powers are optimistic.

“I’m in a writers’ room for it at the moment, and we’re hoping,” creator Joe Barton told Variety when asked about the possibility of Black Doves season 3.

If all goes well, new episodes could arrive in late 2027 or 2028.

Black Doves Cast

  • Keira Knightley as Helen Webb
  • Ben Whishaw as Sam Young
  • Sarah Lancashire as Elizabeth Reed
  • Andrew Buchan as Wallace Webb
  • Ella Lily Hyland as Fionnuala Williams
  • Gabrielle Creevy as Eleanor Davies
  • Charlotte Rice-Foley as Jacqueline Webb
  • Taylor Sullivan as Oliver “Oli” Webb
  • Neve Campbell as Cecile Mason
  • Ambika Mod as Laila Joshi

What Is Black Doves About?

Black Doves follows Helen, who is married to a senior British politician. Her secret? For years, she’s been working as a spy for an organisation called the Black Doves, which collects and sells information to the highest bidder.

Helen’s job is to get close to powerful people. In that regard, her husband Wallace, who doesn’t know about her double life, is a great resource. When Helen’s secret lover is murdered, her handler calls in Sam, an old friend who happens to be a skilled assassin. He agrees to protect Helen and help her investigate the murder. Naturally, they discover some stuff along the way.

In season 2, Wallace is on the verge of becoming Britain’s prime minister. This puts Helen in an increasingly uncomfortable position. While she has never been closer to the centre of political power, she’s also never been more exposed. Before long, complications arise.

No spoilers, but the explosive finale definitely lets fans craving more. If you like your spy thrillers with a healthy dose of character drama and witty dialogue, Black Doves season 3 can’t come soon enough.

Are There Other Shows Like Black Doves?

Enjoying Black Doves? Shows with similar vibes include Slow Horses, The Night Manager, The Agency, Killing Eve, Ponies, and The Diplomat.

The Undetectable Era: How Needle-Free Treatments Became Pop Culture’s Quiet Beauty Trend

For years, polish on screen and stage came with tells: smoothed-over filters, a brow that barely moved, cheeks a little too round. The look stars are going for now is quieter, and best described as you, but rested. The needle-free beauty trend is part of that shift, because HD cameras and close-up video make overdone work easy to spot, and many people now want gradual, natural-looking change rather than an obvious one.

From Filters to Real Skin

Filters promised flawless skin, but they also taught audiences to notice the seams: the waxy smoothness, the warped edges, the face that moves slightly out of sync. As viewers got better at spotting digital smoothing, they got better at spotting its real-world equivalent.

The aesthetic taking its place is sometimes called undetectable beauty, the idea that good work shouldn’t announce itself. It is an ideal rather than a promise, and no treatment can guarantee it, but it explains the vocabulary of the moment: refreshed, rested, natural.

Why the Shift Is Happening

  • HD cameras. Modern cameras capture detail that older formats softened, so texture, lines, and over-treatment all show.
  • Close-up social video. Faces are now watched at arm’s length on a phone, often in motion, where stiffness is easier to spot.
  • A backlash against overdone work. Visible, exaggerated results have drawn criticism, and many people now describe wanting to look like themselves.
  • Convenience. Short appointments and little downtime suit people who can’t disappear for a week.

What “Needle-Free” Means in Practice

Needle-free here refers to energy-based treatments rather than injectables. Instead of adding volume with fillers or relaxing muscles with injections, they use controlled energy, such as ultrasound, radiofrequency, or laser, to warm tissue beneath the surface and prompt the skin to produce new collagen. The category is often described as non-invasive wrinkle reduction and skin tightening. Results build gradually and tend to be subtle, which is the point.

Needle-free doesn’t mean risk-free or right for everyone, and the tools solve different problems. Fillers add volume and neuromodulators relax expression lines, while energy-based treatments aim at skin quality and firmness.

Where Sofwave™ Skin Tightening Fits

Sofwave™ is one example. It is a non-invasive ultrasound treatment with FDA clearance for improving the appearance of facial lines and wrinkles, and for lifting the eyebrow, as well as lax tissue beneath the chin and on the neck. The eyebrow, under-chin, and neck indications are for adults aged 22 and over.

Sofwave skin tightening delivers focused ultrasound energy to the mid-dermis, about 1.5 millimetres beneath the skin’s surface, where it prompts collagen remodelling. FDA clearance applies to specific uses of a specific device, and it is a US regulatory status, so availability and rules differ by country. It is worth asking any clinic what applies where you live.

What a Session Involves

A visit starts with a consultation, where the provider reviews your concerns, health history, and goals. A topical numbing cream is often applied, and the provider then moves a handheld applicator over the treatment area. Most people feel warmth, and some notice brief discomfort.

A full face and neck session takes about 30 to 45 minutes, and most people return to their day with minimal downtime, though temporary redness or swelling can occur. Results build gradually, generally over about 8 to 12 weeks, so this is not a last-minute fix before a premiere or a wedding.

Approaching It Sensibly

The quiet trend is easy to admire and harder to judge from the outside, because the best work leaves no obvious trace. That makes it worth approaching carefully.

  • Start with a consultation with a qualified, licensed provider.
  • Ask what the device is cleared for and whether it matches your concerns.
  • Set realistic expectations: modest, gradual improvement, not the effect of surgery.
  • Be wary of guarantees or pressure to book.
  • Remember that doing nothing is also a valid choice, since ageing is not a problem that needs solving.

Naima Bock Signs to Fire Talk, Shares New Single

Naima Bock has signed to Fire Talk/Breakfast Records, marking the announcement with a new song called ‘Rocks’. The track was produced by Jack Ogborne and recorded at St Mark’s Church in north London, with additional arrangements by Oliver Hamilton (caroline, Shovel Dance Collective) and Bock herself. Check out it via the accompanying music video below.

“‘Rocks’ is a very personal song, the story of which I’ll leave to the listener to interpret. It came to me on a rainy autumn night as my flight was ascending to somewhere less cold. I’d been listening to Palace Music non-stop for a month. Writing it saved me from my chronic oscillation between to-be home and not-to-be home, that is when I decided I would do both.”

Bock’s last album was 2024’s Below a Massive Dark Land. Last year, she shared the standalone single ‘Rolling’. Revisit our Artist Spotlight interview with Naima Bock.

Gang of Youths Announce New Album ‘Compañero’, Share New Single

Gang of Youths have detailed a new album to coincide with the announcement they’ll be playing Coachella next year. The follow-up to 2022’s angel in realtime is called Compañero, and it’s out March 12. It includes the previously released single ‘Things Take Time’, and today they’ve shared a new single, the sparkly, uptempo ‘Benny’s Video’, which takes its name from the 1992 Michael Haneke film. Check it out below.

“I think we’ve established by now that mortality and death are never going to be far from the surface of a Gang Of Youths song, but the prism through which they’re observed has shifted,” violinist and multi-instrumentalist Tom Hobden said in a statement. “You might as well face death with a wry smile, because you can’t outrun it. The darkness doesn’t need to diminish the warmth, and the warmth doesn’t have to disguise the darkness. There’s no reason a record about death shouldn’t also be a celebration of being alive, however ridiculous and unremarkable that might sometimes be.”

Frontman David Le’aupepe added: “I had this realization that I didn’t need to channel all this brutality anymore. I used to do that out of some shame about being an artist. But I began looking at my life and experience, and began to think that making art is a worthwhile thing to continue exploring in itself.”

The new album was recorded across the UK, with sessions taking place at Decoy Studios alongside in-house engineer Robert Sellens and additional sessions at Redchurch, Urchin, Hoxa, and Cloud 9. The band sought to record the album live as much as possible, with Jung Kim primarily producing and engineering.  “We’re actually incredibly goofy and light-hearted, and I think we wanted this to be felt in what we made next,” Kim commented. “The approach was often quite whimsical, leading to uncharted territory sonically.”

“Real life doesn’t dictate anything; it just throws things at you and expects you to trip over them occasionally,” Le’aupepe concluded. “That’s how I want to create, and to enjoy my life and my relationships. It’s always a process of becoming.”

Compañero Cover Artwork:

GangOfYouths_Companero_Cover_3000x3000 copy.

Compañero Tracklist:

1. This Machine, It’s A Classic
2. Things Take Time
3. YeYu
4. Manilla ’98
5. Street Value
6. Desert Life Museum
7. Benny’s Video
8. Major Arcana
9. Ants Control the World
10. Which Side of the River Are You On?
11. Future Be Kind

Coachella Announces 2027 Lineup

The 2027 Coachella lineup has been revealed. Returning to Empire Polo Club in Indio the weekends of April 9-11 and 16-18, the festival will be headlined by Dua Lipa, Tame Impala, and SZA. Madonna (“in the dance tent”), Phoebe Bridgers, Weezer, Robyn, Zara Larsson, and Daddy Yankee are also set to perform.

Other notable acts in the lineup include Pinegrove (who have been on hiatus since 2023), Caroline Polachek, Angine de Poitrine, Steve Lacy, underscores, Shygirl, Tove Lo, Four Tet, ear, Twisted Teens, Peggy Gou, Kehlani, Giorgio Moroder, Bassvictim, Role Model, Gang of Youths, Adéla, Magdalena Bay, Nirosta Steel, Mariah the Scientist, Drain Gang, This Is Lorelei, Remi Wolf, MUNA, the Avalanches, American Football, Nettspend, Tiffany Day, and more. Check out the festival’s website for ticket info.

Sabrina Carpenter, Justin Bieber, and Karol G topped the Coachella bill last year.

Coachella

Taken: Natalee Holloway Season 2: Cast, Rumours & Release Date

0

True crime continues to soar on Netflix. The platform’s latest addition is no exception. Taken: Natalee Holloway revisits one of the most widely publicised missing-person cases of the 2000s.

With 12.9 million views this week, the three-part docuseries is currently one of the most-watched titles on the service, as well as the #1 show in 20 countries. Could more episodes be on the way? Here’s what we know so far.

Taken: Natalee Holloway Season 2 Release Date

At the time of writing, there’s no news about a potential Taken: Natalee Holloway season 2.

Given that this is a docuseries depicting true events, more episodes are unlikely unless new information comes to light. A 2023 confession brought some answers, so we’re guessing the three episodes available are all we’re going to get for now.

Taken: Natalee Holloway Cast

  • Beth Holloway
  • Madison Greer
  • Claire Fierman
  • John Kelly
  • Sue Remick
  • Charles Croes
  • Dilma Arends Geerman
  • Gerold Dompig

What Is Taken: Natalee Holloway About?

Directed by Dani Sloane and Matthew Galkin, the series follows the disappearance of 18-year-old Natalee Holloway. She vanished during a high school graduation trip to Aruba in May 2005. Her mother, Beth Holloway, embarked on a nearly two-decade quest for answers.

Taken: Natalee Holloway is told through Beth’s recollections, as well as interviews with Natalee’s friends, investigators, and other people involved in the case. The documentary retraces the frantic initial search and the investigation’s many setbacks. It also covers the media frenzy that surrounded the family’s ordeal. Above all, it highlights Beth’s determination to establish what happened to her daughter.

Viewers can follow the case from Natalee’s initial disappearance through the investigation’s most troubling developments and the eventual breakthrough. The story took an even more disturbing turn when Joran van der Sloot, a Dutch national who became the main suspect, attempted to extort money from Beth in exchange for details about her daughter’s whereabouts. He was convicted in Peru of murdering another young woman in 2010. In October 2023, he pleaded guilty to federal extortion and wire-fraud charges in the United States and admitted to killing Natalee.

While Taken: Natalee Holloway season 2 probably won’t become reality, the docuseries offers a comprehensive picture of the case. Moreover, it features previously unreleased FBI footage and a fuller account of the long-awaited confession. Overall, it’s an engaging watch.

Are There Other Shows Like Taken: Natalee Holloway?

If you found Taken: Natalee Holloway intriguing, check out some of the other non-fiction content available on Netflix.

Recent additions include The One About Matthew Perry, The New Stanford Prison Experiment, Death of the Pastor’s Wife, Conversations with a Killer: The Charles Manson Tapes, and The Idaho Murders: College Nightmare.

John Malkovich Net Worth, Salary & Highest Grossing Movies

0

John Malkovich started his career on the stage in the late ‘70s before he eventually transitioned to the screen. While he is generally associated with challenging independent films and theatre, he has also appeared in some of the biggest franchises of the past few decades.

As a result, his net worth should be considerable by now, right? Here’s what we know about the actor’s earnings.

John Malkovich Net Worth

In 2026, John Malkovich’s net worth is estimated to be $25 million.

The bulk of it is thanks to his extensive and lucrative Hollywood career. In 1976, he became a member of Chicago’s Steppenwolf Theatre Company. His theatrical work established him as a serious stage performer before his breakthrough on screen came in the 1980s. Notable early roles included The Killing Fields, Places in the Heart, Death of a Salesman, The Glass Menagerie, and Empire of the Sun. He delivered one of his defining performances in 1988, as the manipulative Vicomte de Valmont in Dangerous Liaisons.

During the 1990s, Malkovich became associated with sophisticated villains and morally ambiguous figures. He appeared in The Sheltering Sky. Played Lennie Small in Of Mice and Men. Offered a chilling portrayal of assassin Mitch Leary in In the Line of Fire. His resume also features roles in action blockbuster Con Air, opposite Nicolas Cage, and action drama The Man in the Iron Mask, opposite Leonardo DiCaprio.

The actor took one of the boldest roles of his career in Spike Jonze’s surreal comedy Being John Malkovich, which came out in 1999. He played a fictional version of himself in a story about a portal into his own consciousness. The film became a cult classic and showcased his willingness to poke fun at his own public persona.

Over the following decade, Malkovich continued to move between independent cinema and mainstream entertainment. You might have seen him in Shadow of the Vampire, Ripley’s Game, Johnny English, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Eragon, Burn After Reading, or Changeling, among others.

Malkovich became familiar to a new generation during the 2010s via a series of big-budget productions like RED, Transformers: Dark of the Moon, and Warm Bodies. He also voiced the villainous octopus Dave in the animated film Penguins of Madagascar and appeared in Netflix’s post-apocalyptic thriller Bird Box. On top of that, he played Hercule Poirot in the BBC adaptation The ABC Murders and had a lead role in HBO series The New Pope.

The veteran actor stayed busy in recent years as well. He was in workplace sitcom Space Force, voiced Mr. B in adult comedy series Ten Year Old Tom, and portrayed Lucien Lelong in The New Look. Movie credits include The Survivalist, Chariot, Mindcage, Opus, and The Yellow Tie, to name only a few.

Beyond acting, Malkovich has directed and continues to work in theatre. He co-founded a production company, released clothing lines, and invested in hospitality businesses. Unfortunately, he lost millions in the 2008 Madoff investment scandal.

John Malkovich Salary

Actor salaries are rarely public, so we don’t know for sure how much Malkovich makes for a certain role.

That said, he did open up about repeatedly turning down Marvel because of pay disputes. He was supposed to play a comic book villain in Fantastic Four: First Steps, but his performance was cut from the theatrical release.

For Space Force, Malkovich is rumoured to have been paid $300,000 per episode.

John Malkovich Highest Grossing Movies

John Malkovich’s highest-grossing movie is Transformers: Dark of the Moon, which made $1.123 billion worldwide. Penguins of Madagascar, Eragon, and Con Air also performed well.

This year, fans can catch Malkovich in Wild Horse Nine. The movie is getting a fair amount of buzz at the moment.

Every Game Wants to Be a Casino, and Every Casino Wants to Be a Game

The line between video games and online gambling is becoming increasingly blurred. Modern games use randomized rewards, virtual currencies, and monetization systems that resemble gambling, while online casinos are adopting features traditionally associated with gaming, including progression systems, interactive challenges, and competitive elements.

Both industries are moving toward a similar objective: keeping users engaged for longer and encouraging repeat participation. What once separated gaming from gambling is becoming less obvious as developers and casino operators borrow ideas from each other’s business models.

How video games started borrowing from casinos

One of the clearest examples of this convergence is the rise of loot boxes and randomized rewards. Players spend real money or virtual currency without knowing exactly what they will receive, creating anticipation similar to that associated with casino games.

Gacha mechanics have taken this approach further, particularly in mobile gaming, where players repeatedly purchase opportunities to unlock rare characters or items. Limited-time rewards and collectible content introduce additional incentives to spend.

The similarities become more significant when virtual items can be traded or exchanged for real-world value. Although not every randomized reward legally qualifies as gambling, the underlying mechanics increasingly resemble systems traditionally associated with casinos.

Why online casinos are becoming more like games

The convergence also works in reverse. Traditional online casinos relied heavily on slots, roulette, and card games, but newer platforms increasingly offer experiences that resemble mobile and arcade games.

Crash games, mines-style games, and interactive challenges introduce visual feedback and rapid decision-making. These formats can make gambling feel more like playing a video game, even when outcomes remain largely determined by chance.

The trend is also visible among platforms offering crypto casinos in the UK, where digital currencies intersect with increasingly game-like gambling interfaces. However, cryptocurrency payments do not remove gambling licensing requirements, and access to a platform does not necessarily mean it is authorized to serve UK customers.

Casino operators are also introducing achievements, tournaments, loyalty tiers, and reward systems. These features encourage repeated participation and create a sense of progression beyond individual wagers.

The psychology behind the convergence

Gaming and gambling increasingly rely on similar psychological mechanisms. Random rewards create anticipation, while progression systems give users a visible sense of achievement.

In video games, players may continue purchasing loot boxes in pursuit of rare items. In casinos, loyalty rewards and interactive features can encourage continued participation even when players are losing money.

The distinction is important because engagement does not necessarily translate into better outcomes. A casino game may offer interactive decisions and achievement systems without giving players meaningful control over the underlying probabilities.

Research into loot boxes has identified associations between spending on randomized rewards and gambling-related problems. However, these findings do not establish that gaming mechanics directly cause gambling behavior, and individual risk factors remain relevant.

Why both industries are moving in the same direction

The convergence is driven partly by changing business models. Video games have increasingly shifted from one-time purchases toward free-to-play experiences supported by ongoing transactions, subscriptions, and digital rewards.

For developers, this creates opportunities to generate revenue throughout a game’s lifespan rather than relying exclusively on initial sales. Maintaining player engagement becomes central to financial performance.

Online casinos face similar competitive pressures. With numerous platforms offering comparable gambling products, operators increasingly compete through user experience, mobile accessibility, and entertainment features.

The difference lies in how revenue is generated. Video-game publishers primarily monetize purchases and subscriptions, while casinos generally earn money through the mathematical advantage built into gambling products. Applying similar engagement strategies to these different models raises important questions about consumer protection.

Regulation is struggling to keep up

The growing overlap creates challenges for regulators because legal definitions do not always match how digital products function.

In the UK, gambling regulation considers whether participants stake something of value, whether outcomes involve chance, and whether prizes have monetary value. Virtual items that can be exchanged for cash may therefore receive different treatment from rewards confined to a game.

This becomes particularly complicated when third-party marketplaces allow players to trade digital assets outside their original platforms. Products that appear to be ordinary entertainment can develop financial characteristics resembling gambling.

Regulators must also account for differences in audience. Video games are widely accessible to younger users, while regulated gambling products face age restrictions and additional consumer safeguards.

Where gaming and gambling go next

The convergence between gaming and gambling is unlikely to disappear. Mobile technology, personalized experiences, and increasingly sophisticated digital economies give both industries more opportunities to adopt each other’s features.

However, greater regulatory scrutiny could influence how randomized rewards, virtual currencies, and gambling-style mechanics are implemented.

The central question is no longer whether video games and casinos will continue borrowing ideas from one another. It is how far that convergence can go before consumers struggle to distinguish entertainment from financial risk.

For players, the most meaningful distinction remains whether participation involves real money, how outcomes are determined, and how much control they actually have over the result.